Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Peritoneal Cavity
Paula Marincola Smith1,2, Jessica J Lie3, Ashlee Seldomridge3
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. psmith7@mdanderson.org.
Repeat cytoreductive surgery (CRS) offers survival benefits for select colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with recurrent peritoneal metastases (PM). Recurrence-free survival after the first CRS predicts outcomes after a second CRS, supporting re-do CRS consideration.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern, with peritoneal metastases (PM) indicating a poor prognosis.
- While cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival for initial CRC-PM, the efficacy of repeat CRS for recurrent PM is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of repeat cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (PM).
- To determine the predictive value of initial CRS outcomes on subsequent recurrence-free survival (RFS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) after repeat CRS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 139 colorectal cancer patients who underwent one or more CRS procedures between 2008 and 2023.
- Evaluation of recurrence-free survival (RFS), peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
- Comparison of outcomes between single and multiple CRS procedures, and between 'complete' versus 'targeted' index CRS.
Main Results:
- 81% of patients experienced recurrence after the first CRS (CRS1), with most having peritoneal recurrence.
- Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and peritoneal disease-free survival (PDFS) were similar after CRS1 and CRS2 (p=0.17 and p=0.34).
- Patients undergoing 'targeted' index CRS had shortened PDFS (p<0.01) but similar overall survival (OS) compared to 'complete' CRS.
Conclusions:
- Outcomes after the first CRS (CRS1) largely predict outcomes after the second CRS (CRS2).
- A subset of patients can achieve long-term RFS/PDFS after repeat CRS.
- Re-do CRS should be considered for carefully selected patients with recurrent colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases.
More Related Videos
06:49Orthotopic Implantation of Patient-Derived Cancer Cells in Mice Recapitulates Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Published on: February 10, 2023
04:22Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Published on: March 3, 2023