Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Differences in the Movement of the Glenoid Over the Humeral Head Between Subject-Specific and Generalized
Linus Hötzel1,2, Lena Uhlenberg3,4, Heiko Gottschling5
1Stryker Sports Medicine, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Abstract:
Hill-Sachs lesion engagement, which is used for clinical decision-making in shoulder instability, is typically based on a static assessment, but would ideally be dynamically evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences between subject-specific and generalized glenohumeral motion. For five arm movements (forward elevation, scapula abduction, coronal abduction, external rotation at 90° abduction and external rotation at rest) of 20 participants, the average rotation and translation of the scapula and humerus throughout the forward movement were calculated. Metrics (length, distance, angle, and area) of the glenoid projection on the humerus were compared between the subject-specific and generalized (average of all subjects) motion. The impact of virtually generated glenoid bone loss (GBL) on the glenoid projection area was also investigated. Humeral rotation confidence intervals were narrow for abduction movements. The generalized and subject-specific glenoid projection metrics were similar. The average difference in the length of the glenoid movement over the humeral surface between the subject-specific and generalized motion ranged between 1-3 mm and the glenoid projection area differed between 1% and 7% for the five motions. The average distance between the subject-specific and generalized motion at the start or end position was less than 1 mm apart. GBL resulted in a subtly reduced glenoid projection area. STATEMENT OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The similarity between the subject-specific and generalized glenohumeral motion for the five movements included in this study suggests that applying a generalized motion to patient-specific three-dimensional bone models may be an interesting direction for evaluating bipolar bone loss. Level of Evidence: Level II (Control subjects; Development of diagnostic criteria).
Related Concept Videos
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist,...
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Bones of the Upper Limb: Humerus
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...

