Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Organic Peroxyacids for Eradicating Dairy Biofilms Using an Approach Combining Static and Dynamic Methods
Published on: December 9, 2022
Efficacy of hydrogen peroxide vaporizing against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum
Narimi Miyazaki1, Ai Kurumiya1, Mina Takayama1
1Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Background:
Environmental contamination with drug-resistant bacteria and spore-forming organisms such as Clostridioides difficile poses a significant risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). While manual disinfection using disinfectant-impregnated cloths is standard practice, it is susceptible to human error and may leave residual contamination by pathogens.
Methods:
We evaluated the bactericidal efficacy of hydrogen peroxide vaporizing using a compact device (NOCOSPRAY2) in a simulated hospital room (28.8 m3). Surfaces were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, ATCC43300), ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (NCTC13353), or C. difficile (ATCC9689), followed by drying. Vaporizing was performed at three different settings: 2-min spray +60-min contact (1 × ), 6-min spray + 90-min contact (3 × ), and 9-min spray + 90-min contact (5 × ). Viable bacterial counts were determined post-vaporizing to calculate log reduction values.
Results:
For MRSA, a significant bactericidal effect of ≥5 logs was observed after 6 min of vaporization. For ESBL-producing E. coli, a significant bactericidal effect of ≥5 logs was observed after 2 min of vaporization. For C. difficile, a significant sporicidal effect of ≥3 logs was observed after 2 min of vaporization. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations outside the room remained below safety thresholds throughout all tests.
Conclusion:
Hydrogen peroxide vaporizing demonstrated broad-spectrum efficacy against drug-resistant and spore-forming organisms, including C. difficile, including high-touch surfaces commonly found in hospital settings. This no-touch disinfection method may serve as a valuable adjunct or alternative to manual cleaning for environmental decontamination in healthcare settings.
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...

