Evaluation of Exposure Assessment Methods and Procedures for Induction Hobs
Jingtian Xi1, Sven Kühn1, Cosimo Fortunato2
1IT'IS Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bioelectromagnetics
|September 29, 2025
Summary
Induction hobs can emit magnetic fields exceeding safety levels. This study shows low-exposure designs are possible, but current testing standards may underestimate real-world risks for users.
Area of Science:
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Electromagnetic field exposure
- Household appliance safety
Background:
- Induction hobs generate strong magnetic fields, potentially exceeding international safety guidelines.
- Stray electromagnetic fields from induction hobs can be substantial, even at distances.
- Existing safety guidelines (ICNIRP, IEEE) provide reference levels, but exceeding them doesn't automatically violate basic restrictions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess electromagnetic field (EMF) exposures from the latest generation of induction hobs.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of current testing methodologies (IEC 62233, IEC 63184) for household appliances.
- To explore alternative, accurate, and affordable methods for EMF exposure assessment.
Main Methods:
- Applied advanced instrumentation and multiple methods, including IEC 62233 and IEC 63184 procedures.
- Assessed maximum exposure configurations and sampled 3D magnetic field distributions.
- Performed numerical dosimetric evaluations in anatomical models using measured fields.
Main Results:
- Significant variations in EMF exposure were observed across different induction hobs (up to >20 difference).
- Low-exposure induction hob designs are feasible without compromising cooking performance.
- The IEC 62233 standard may underestimate user exposure by a factor of >30 compared to ICNIRP/IEEE limits.
Conclusions:
- Induction hob EMF exposure varies significantly, indicating potential for safer designs.
- Current standard testing (IEC 62233) may not adequately ensure user safety.
- Alternative assessment approaches, like those derived from IEC 63184, offer a balance of accuracy and affordability.


