Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.7K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.7K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

497
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
497
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

1.0K
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.0K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.3K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of a tool for the assessment of psychiatric disability in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2025
Same author

Item generation and establishing face and content validity of a rating scale: A primer.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2025
Same author

A primer on reliability testing of a rating scale.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2025
Same author

Translation and adaptation of rating scales.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2025
Same author

Role of decentralised governance in implementing the National AIDS Control Programme in Kerala.

Public health action·2023
Same author

Validation of an Ultrashort Screening Tool for Specific Learning Disorder Among School-Going Children.

Indian journal of psychological medicine·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

Criterion validity, construct validity, and factor analysis: An introductory overview.

P V Indu1, K Vidhukumar2, Deenu Chacko3

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Govt. Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

Indian Journal of Psychiatry
|September 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article details psychometric testing, focusing on criterion and construct validity, and factor analysis for rating scales. It explains how to ensure a scale accurately measures its intended purpose.

Keywords:
Concurrent and predictive validityconstruct validityconvergent and divergent validitycriterion validityexploratory factor analysisprincipal component analysis

More Related Videos

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K
A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.1K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Health Sciences Research Methodology

Background:

  • This article is the final in a series on developing and psychometrically testing rating scales.
  • It builds upon previous discussions of content validity, focusing on criterion and construct validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the assessment of criterion validity and construct validity in rating scales.
  • To explain the application of factor analysis (FA) as a method for evaluating construct validity.

Main Methods:

  • Criterion validity is assessed by correlating a new scale with a "gold standard" criterion (concurrent or predictive).
  • Construct validity is evaluated by examining convergent and divergent validity, often using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
  • Exploratory factor analysis (FA) steps are detailed as a multivariate technique to assess relationships between variables and underlying factors.

Main Results:

  • Pearson's correlation coefficient and phi coefficient are presented as measures for criterion validity.
  • Pearson's correlation coefficient is used to estimate convergent and divergent validity for construct validity.
  • Factor analysis is identified as a key method for assessing construct validity, with exploratory FA discussed in detail.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate psychometric testing, including criterion and construct validity, is crucial for reliable rating scales.
  • Factor analysis provides a robust method for evaluating the underlying structure and construct validity of measurement tools.
  • Understanding these validation techniques ensures the development of high-quality instruments for research and clinical practice.