Multicenter Spanish study on vedolizumab intravenous to subcutaneous switch in patients with inflammatory bowel
Beatriz Gros1, Noemí Manceñido2, José Manuel Benítez3
1Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía. Universidad de Córdoba, Spain.
Background And Aims:
despite the established use of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab to treat inflammatory bowel disease, there is growing interest in exploring the advantages of the novel subcutaneous (SC) route. However, comprehensive real-world evidence regarding the extended safety and effectiveness remain scarce.
Methods:
inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) patients on IV vedolizumab treatment in clinical remission from 24 Spanish hospitals were given the option to transition to SC injections (where this formulation was available) or to remain on IV, whereas patients from centers without access to SC vedolizumab remained on IV therapy. Data encompassing clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, adverse events, treatment persistence, and disease-related outcomes were retrospectively gathered from prospectively maintained clinical records at baseline, and at weeks 12, 24, and 48.
Results:
a total of 207 patients were identified and 23 were excluded as they were not in clinical remission, resulting in a final total of 184 patients included in the study. Of these, 53 (28.8 %) remained on IV vedolizumab, while 131 (71.2 %) transitioned to SC. There were 108 (58.7 %) patients with ulcerative colitis and 76 (41.3 %) with Crohn's disease. Both groups had comparable demographic characteristics, except for Crohn's disease behavior, with non-inflammatory non-stricturing pattern (B1 Montreal classification) being predominant among patients who transitioned to SC (p = 0.023). No differences were observed in drug persistence (log rank test p = 0.82). Clinical, biochemical and fecal calprotectin remission at the different time-points were comparable at each time point with the exception of clinical remission at week 12, favoring SC over IV. Drug intensification occurred in 24.5 % of patients on IV versus none on SC, p < 0.0001. Safety was consistent with that previously reported, and there were no differences between the groups (13 [8 %] SC vs 1 [2.1 %] IV, p = 0.059), most being mild in nature.
Conclusions:
transitioning from IV to SC vedolizumab in patients with IBD in remission showed a comparable effectiveness to maintain disease remission and persistence. Patients on IV are more likely to require drug intensification during follow-up.
More Related Videos
08:27Dynamic Adhesion Assay for the Functional Analysis of Anti-adhesion Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published on: September 20, 2018
09:01Non-invasive Assessment of the Efficacy of New Therapeutics for Intestinal Pathologies Using Serial Endoscopic Imaging of Live Mice
Published on: March 10, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
