Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP02:36

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP

12.1K
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, or ChIP, is an antibody-based technique used to identify sites on DNA that bind to transcription factors of interest or histone proteins. It also helps determine the type of histone modifications such as acetylation, phosphorylation, or methylation.
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...
12.1K
Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression02:35

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

24.6K
Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the nucleus greatly influences  access to genetic information. Generally, the nucleus' periphery is considered transcriptionally repressive, while the cell's interior is considered a transcriptionally active area. 
Topologically Associated Domains (TADs)
The 3-dimensional positioning of chromatin in the nucleus influences the...
24.6K
Heterochromatin02:38

Heterochromatin

17.8K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions that take up more dye are called heterochromatin. Heterochromatin is further classified into two forms – constitutive heterochromatin and facultative heterochromatin.
Constitutive heterochromatin: It is a highly compact region of chromatin that is mostly concentrated in the centromere and telomere. Unlike euchromatin, the amino acid at...
17.8K
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications02:25

Spreading of Chromatin Modifications

9.3K
The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer...
9.3K
Euchromatin01:01

Euchromatin

8.8K
The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions take up more dye, appearing darker, while the less-compact areas take up less dye and appear lighter. Based on the compaction level, chromatins are classified into two primary forms – euchromatin and heterochromatin.
Euchromatin is the less dense region of the chromatin and stains lighter. Euchromatin contains histone H3 extensively...
8.8K
Nucleosome Remodeling02:54

Nucleosome Remodeling

10.8K
Nucleosomes are the basic units of chromatin compaction. Each nucleosome consists of the DNA bound tightly around a histone core, which makes the DNA inaccessible to DNA binding proteins such as DNA polymerase and RNA polymerase. Hence, the fundamental problem is to ensure access to DNA when appropriate, despite the compact and protective chromatin structure.
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...
10.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A generalizable Hi-C foundation model for chromatin architecture, single-cell and multiomics analysis across species.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Decoding common and rare noncoding variant effects across cellular and developmental contexts.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Label-Free Quantification in the Crux Toolkit.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Prioritizing peptides for targeted mass spectrometry experiments using deep learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Embryo-scale Visual Cell Sorting reveals a conserved transcriptomic signature of nucleolar size linked to proteostasis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

MORC3 represses a tandem repeat enhancer to regulate interferon.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales
10:15

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

4.1K

Predicting chromatin conformation contact maps.

Alan Min1, Jacob Schreiber2, Anshul Kundaje2

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a machine learning model to analyze 3D genome structure data from various assays and cell types. This model helps understand how chromatin 3D architecture varies across different cell types and experimental methods.

More Related Videos

Mapping Mammalian 3D Genome Interactions with Micro-C-XL
11:41

Mapping Mammalian 3D Genome Interactions with Micro-C-XL

Published on: November 3, 2023

3.5K
Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C
09:32

Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales
10:15

Capturing Chromosome Conformation Across Length Scales

Published on: January 20, 2023

4.1K
Mapping Mammalian 3D Genome Interactions with Micro-C-XL
11:41

Mapping Mammalian 3D Genome Interactions with Micro-C-XL

Published on: November 3, 2023

3.5K
Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C
09:32

Deciphering High-Resolution 3D Chromatin Organization via Capture Hi-C

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing assays have advanced the study of DNA's 3D conformation within the nucleus over the last 15 years.
  • Different assays provide distinct views of 3D chromatin architecture, complicating the understanding of genome structure-function relationships.
  • Key questions involve how chromatin 3D structure differs between cell types and across assay methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically explore variations in genome 3D architecture across cell types and assay types.
  • To develop a computational model for predicting and analyzing 3D chromatin contact maps.
  • To investigate changes in chromatin structure at the levels of compartments, domains, and loops.

Main Methods:

  • Assembled a comprehensive collection of 3D chromatin datasets (2D contact maps) from diverse assay and cell types.
  • Developed and applied a machine learning model to predict missing contact map data within the collection.
  • Utilized the predictive model to systematically analyze structural variations.

Main Results:

  • The machine learning model successfully predicted missing 3D chromatin contact maps.
  • Systematic exploration revealed how genome 3D architecture, including compartments, domains, and loops, differs between cell types.
  • Significant variations in chromatin architecture were also observed between different assay types, even within the same cell type.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning offers a powerful approach to integrate and analyze diverse 3D genome conformation datasets.
  • Understanding the interplay between cell type, assay methodology, and chromatin 3D structure is crucial for interpreting genome function.
  • This study provides a framework for dissecting the complexities of genome architecture and its functional implications.