Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Cardiovascular risk thresholds for intensifying primary care encounter frequency for patients with type 2 diabetes
Wanchun Xu1, Emily Tsui Yee Tse1, Peter Tanuseputro1
1Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care (Xu, Tse, Tanuseputro, Lam, Wan), Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Department of Family Medicine (Tse, Lam), The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China; Institut du Savoir Montfort (Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.; Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research (Wan), Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, and Institute of Cardiovascular Science and Medicine (Wan), Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong; Advanced Data Analytics for Medical Science Limited (Wan), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Background:
Determining optimal timing for intensifying the frequency of physician encounters for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires trade-offs between timely care and clinician burden. We aimed to investigate age-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk thresholds used for intensifying encounter frequency in patients with T2DM in primary care.
Methods:
Using population-based public electronic health records from the Hospital Authority Clinical Management System in Hong Kong, we used data from patients with a baseline 10-year CVD risk of lower than 20% and a regular follow-up interval of 4-6 months at public primary care clinics. We compared different CVD risk thresholds (> 20% v. 30%) at which to shorten follow-up intervals to 3 months or less. We investigated age-specific effects by categorizing patients into 4 age groups (< 50, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥ 70 yr). In the causal framework of the target trial emulation, we used a dynamic marginal structural model to estimate absolute risk differences for 5-year incidence of CVD, under the assumption of no unmeasured confounding.
Results:
We identified 44 813 patients. Compared with the risk threshold of 20%, adopting the threshold of 30% did not increase risk of overall CVD in patients younger than 50 years (absolute risk difference 0.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6% to 1.0%]) and aged 50-59 years (absolute risk difference 0.7%, 95% CI -0.1% to 1.4%). However, we observed an increased risk in older patients, aged 60-69 years (absolute risk difference 1.5%, 95% CI 0.6% to 2.5%) and 70 years or older (absolute risk difference 2.7%, 95% CI 0.6% to 4.9%).
Interpretation:
When adopting a less stringent CVD risk threshold of 30% to intensify encounter frequency, we found progressively increasing risks with age for 5-year CVD incidence, and age 60 years appears to be a point where the risk becomes pronounced. Our findings suggest that a less stringent threshold could be considered for patients with T2DM who are younger than 60 years but not for those older than 60 years.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
