Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Disentangling climate and policy uncertainties for the Colorado River post-2026 operations
Bowen Wang1,2, Benjamin Bass3, Alex Hall4
1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bowenwang23@g.ucla.edu.
None:
Lakes Mead and Powell in the Colorado River Basin underpin water and hydropower supply for the western United States. While the policies currently regulating the basin will expire by 2026, planning remains challenging due to intertwined climate variability and policy uncertainties. Based on streamflow projections from 10 dynamically downscaled CMIP6 global climate models and unique methods that add and remove internal variability, we evaluate future conditions at Powell and Mead under existing and alternative policies. Due to projected streamflow declines, under existing policy, both reservoirs will face substantial risks (>80% likelihood) of reaching dead pool before 2060. Adopting recently proposed alternative policies reduces but doesn't eliminate such risks. All policies also exhibit tipping points where reservoir levels can change rapidly with a slight change in streamflow. A sustainable policy may require larger reductions to further reduce the reservoirs' dead pool risks and provide better buffers from sudden changes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Global Climate Change
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow
Regulation of Water Output
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Quality of Water

