Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Development and validation of high-sensitivity and high-specificity pubmed search filters for systematic and
Victor Nascimento Fontanive1, Letícia Possebon Müller1, Federico Riva2
1Department of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, room 301, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Objective:
To develop and compare the accuracy of different PubMed search strategies (filters) for systematic and non-systematic reviews in dental journals.
Methods:
This validation study included articles published in 2019 in 15 dental journals. Two search filters were developed: (1) a high-sensitivity filter to retrieve all possible review articles, and (2) a high-specificity filter for systematic reviews. Two previously published filters were used as benchmarks. The gold standard method for identifying the study methodology was manual reading of the full text. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Results:
Among the 2246 articles published, 6.7% (n = 150) were systematic reviews and 5.9% (n = 132) were other types of reviews. The high-sensitivity filter retrieved 147 of 150 systematic reviews and showed a sensitivity of 98.0% (95%CI: 94.3-99.6) and specificity of 88.9% (95%CI: 87.5-90.2). The high-specificity filter had 96.7% (95%CI: 92.4-98.9) sensitivity and 99.1% (95%CI: 98.6-99.5) specificity for retrieving systematic reviews. The accuracy of this filter for systematic reviews was 97.9% (95%CI: 96.4-99.4), which was higher than the PubMed benchmark filter (p < 0.05) and similar to another longer filter.
Conclusion:
This study provides two new highly accurate search filters for PubMed that can be used by clinicians, researchers and policymakers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Filtration and Urine Formation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

