Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025
Evaluation of silver diamine fluoride and biodentine as agents for indirect pulp therapy in primary teeth - A
Daya Srinivasan1, Shoba Narayan2, Jayanthi Mungara3
1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Background:
Vital pulp therapy is crucial for preserving primary teeth vitality in deep carious lesions. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and biodentine are emerging materials with promising biological and therapeutic outcomes.
Aim:
The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical, radiographic, and histological outcomes of SDF and biodentine for indirect pulp therapy in primary molars.
Settings And Design:
This two-phase study included in vivo clinical and radiographic evaluation (Phase 1) and an ex vivo histological assessment (Phase 2). A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 68 children (4-7 years) with deep carious lesions approaching the pulp in primary molars. A total of 136 teeth were included, forming 68 matched pairs.
Materials And Methods:
Phase 1: Participants were randomly assigned to Group 1 (SDF - Test, n = 68) and Group 2 (Biodentine - Control, n = 68). Following caries excavation, 38% SDF or biodentine was applied. All treated teeth were restored with glass ionomer cement and evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, and 9 months. Phase 2: Teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons were histologically examined for dentin bridge formation, pulpal inflammation, and tissue integrity.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using SPSS v23.0. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
At 9 months, Group 2 showed higher clinical success (85.3%) than Group 1 (77.9%) (P = 0.035). Radiographic success was greater in Group 2 (83.8%) compared to Group 1 (70.6%) (P = 0.01). Histological findings favored biodentine.
Conclusion:
Both materials were effective, but biodentine demonstrated superior clinical and biological outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:07Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2017
08:20Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021