Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Sustaining gains following post-stroke memory rehabilitation using eHealth maintenance interventions: The
Dana Wong1, Renerus Stolwyk2,3, David Lawson1
1School of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Telehealth Booster sessions show promise for maintaining memory rehabilitation gains after stroke. These eHealth interventions were acceptable and feasible, with Telehealth Boosters potentially offering the best long-term effects without increased costs.
Area of Science:
- Neurorehabilitation
- Digital Health Interventions
- Stroke Recovery
Background:
- Stroke survivors often experience persistent memory deficits impacting daily life.
- Sustaining the benefits of initial memory rehabilitation is crucial for long-term functional recovery.
- eHealth interventions offer potential solutions for accessible and continuous post-stroke care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of two eHealth maintenance interventions (Telehealth Boosters, Electronic Reminders) versus usual care.
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these eHealth strategies in sustaining post-stroke memory rehabilitation effects.
- To compare the long-term impact of different maintenance strategies on memory function in stroke survivors.
Main Methods:
- A pilot randomized controlled trial involving 38 community-dwelling stroke survivors with memory problems.
- Participants received a 6-week memory skills group followed by randomization to Telehealth Boosters, Electronic Reminders, or Usual Care.
- Outcomes included acceptability, feasibility, nine efficacy measures, and intervention costs, assessed at multiple time points.
Main Results:
- High acceptability and feasibility were reported across all intervention groups.
- Memory gains achieved post-rehabilitation were sustained over time in all conditions, including usual care.
- Telehealth Booster sessions demonstrated the largest within-group effect sizes for most efficacy outcomes.
- While Telehealth Boosters had higher delivery costs, Electronic Reminders incurred greater total costs due to increased service utilization.
Conclusions:
- eHealth interventions are acceptable and feasible for maintaining post-stroke memory rehabilitation effects.
- Telehealth Booster sessions may offer the most effective maintenance strategy without significantly increasing overall costs.
- Further research is warranted to confirm the long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these digital health approaches in stroke recovery.
More Related Videos
07:35Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
11:06A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation
Published on: April 12, 2016