Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

11:18
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
Published on: March 2, 2015
10.8K
Neural decoding of competitive decision-making in Rock-Paper-Scissors
Denise Moerel1, Tijl Grootswagers1,2, Jessica L L Chin1
1The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, 2751, Australia.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|September 30, 2025
Summary
In competitive games, players
Area of Science:
- Social Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Game Theory
Background:
- Social neuroscience traditionally studies isolated brains, limiting understanding of real-time social interactions.
- Hyperscanning allows simultaneous neural recording from multiple interacting individuals.
- Research has primarily explored cooperative tasks, with limited investigation into competitive contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate neural dynamics during competitive decision-making using hyperscanning.
- To examine behavioral and neural strategies in a competitive game context.
- To understand how previous outcomes influence competitive performance.
Main Methods:
- Electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning was employed.
- 62 participants (31 pairs) played a computerized Rock-Paper-Scissors game.
- Multivariate decoding analyzed neural representations of decisions and strategies.
Main Results:
- Participants displayed behavioral biases, deviating from optimal random strategies.
- Neural representations of decisions and strategies were identified within interacting players' brains.
- Losers uniquely encoded information from prior trials, potentially impairing performance.
Conclusions:
- Competitive decision-making is influenced by cognitive biases and past outcomes.
- Achieving true randomness in strategic interactions is challenging.
- This study enhances understanding of decision-making and cognitive dynamics in competition.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method
6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making
898
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
898
Reason and Intuition
7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K

