Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Augmented two-stage estimation for treatment switching in oncology trials: Leveraging external data for improved
Harlan Campbell1,2, Nicholas Latimer3, Jeroen P Jansen1,4
1Precision AQ, HEOR - Evidence Synthesis and Decision Modeling, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Augmented two-stage estimation (ATSE) combines randomized trial data with external data to improve long-term treatment effect estimates. This new method shows promise for reducing bias and increasing precision when external data are unconfounded.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Oncology Research
Background:
- Treatment switching in oncology randomized controlled trials (RCTs) complicates long-term effect estimation.
- Existing methods like two-stage estimation may yield imprecise results with high switching rates or limited sample sizes.
- External control arms using real-world data can be used but ignore valuable RCT data from non-switching participants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a novel method, augmented two-stage estimation (ATSE), for more precise estimation of long-term treatment effects in oncology RCTs with treatment switching.
- To compare the performance of ATSE against traditional two-stage estimation and external control arm approaches using simulation studies.
Main Methods:
- Developed augmented two-stage estimation (ATSE) by creating a 'hybrid non-switching arm' combining data from RCT non-switchers and an external dataset.
- Assessed ATSE performance under specific assumptions: independence of switching from post-progression survival and exchangeability between RCT and external cohorts, conditional on covariates.
- Conducted simulation studies to compare ATSE with two-stage estimation and external control arm methods.
Main Results:
- Augmented two-stage estimation (ATSE) demonstrated potential for reduced bias and improved precision compared to two-stage estimation and external control arms when external data were unconfounded.
- The performance of ATSE was scenario-dependent.
- When external data were subject to unmeasured confounding, ATSE remained prone to bias, though generally to a lesser extent than the external control arm approach.
Conclusions:
- Augmented two-stage estimation (ATSE) offers a promising approach to enhance the accuracy of long-term treatment effect estimation in oncology RCTs with treatment switching.
- The method's effectiveness relies on the availability of unconfounded external data and the validity of its underlying assumptions.
- Further research is warranted to explore ATSE's robustness and applicability in diverse clinical trial settings.
More Related Videos
09:44Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Clinical Trials: Overview