Clinical Experience With Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients With Different Timings

Yohei Tominaga1, Koji Furukawa2

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Breast Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, JPN.

Cureus
|October 1, 2025
PubMed

Pegfilgrastim (pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, PEG-G-CSF) is commonly used as prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) in high-risk chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. However, the optimal timing of PEG-G-CSF injections has not been established, despite several investigations into the subject. In this study, patients received epirubicin-based breast cancer chemotherapy and underwent routine blood tests on days seven or eight of initial chemotherapy to assess the risk of FN. Four patients experienced significant decreases in white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil (NE) counts. To maintain patient safety and relative dose intensity (RDI), the dose was reduced in the second cycle, and PEG-G-CSF administration was moved from day three to day four, as administering PEG-G-CSF within 24 hours to prevent FN is thought to be ineffective. This theory is based on the fact that the WBC and NE expanded by PEG-G-CSF were killed by the remaining chemotherapy. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the next second cycle, administering PEG-G-CSF one day later (day four) after chemotherapy might be effective for these patients. Furthermore, for patients whose blood tests on days seven or eight of the second cycle showed an increase in WBC and NE counts, the chemotherapy dose was increased in the third cycle. Patients with breast cancer (age range: 41-71 years) were assigned to receive PEG-G-CSF on day three or four of a three-week epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimen (dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; or basic epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) using heterochronic timing. We then compared WBC and NE counts in the same individuals over time. In all four cases, WBC and NE counts on day seven or eight were much greater with PEG-G-CSF injection on day four than with injection on day three. As per heterochronic follow-up, which has not been reported previously, day four injection of PEG-G-CSF appears more effective than day three injection for preventing neutropenia. However, due to the small number of cases in this series and the confounding factor of the chemotherapy dose in the third cycle being approximately 8% less than that in the first cycle in Case 2, it is difficult to generalize our findings. Hence, future studies with a longitudinal follow-up involving a larger number of cases are required.

Related Concept Videos

Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells01:15

Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells

Common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) are oligopotent cells that can differentiate into granulocytes and macrophages. Granulocytes and macrophages are essential for protecting the body against bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. They migrate from the bone marrow into the circulating blood to reach specific tissue sites where they differentiate and help in immune surveillance. However, they survive only for a few days and must be continuously made available to the organism to maintain a robust...
3.9K
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists01:27

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists

5-HT3 receptor antagonists, such as dolasetron, granisetron (Kytril), ondansetron (Zofran), and palonosetron (Axoli), are crucial in managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and postoperative nausea. These drugs selectively block 5-HT3 receptors in the visceral vagal and spinal afferent nerves, chemoreceptor trigger zone, and the vomiting center. They have a rapid onset of action and can be given as a single dose before chemotherapy. Ondansetron and granisetron, in particular,...
602
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.9K