Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

07:42
Nerve-sparing Mid-urethral Obstruction NeMO in Female Small Rodents
Published on: April 25, 2017
10.0K
Minimally Invasive Burch Colposuspension to Reduce De Novo Stress Incontinence: The MICRO Randomized Trial
Tsung Mou1, Akira Gillingham2, Julia Geynisman-Tan3
1From the Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Southern Medical Journal
|October 1, 2025
Summary
Adding a prophylactic retropubic colposuspension during minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy did not reduce rates of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in stress-continent patients. The study found no significant difference in SUI development between the groups at three months post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
Background:
- Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common complication after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
- Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy is a standard surgical approach for pelvic organ prolapse.
- The role of prophylactic anti-incontinence procedures during sacrocolpopexy is not fully established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if adding a prophylactic retropubic colposuspension improves outcomes compared to no anti-incontinence procedure.
- To determine the effect on de novo stress urinary incontinence rates after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
Main Methods:
- A randomized superiority trial involving stress-continent patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
- Patients were randomized to receive either prophylactic retropubic colposuspension or no additional procedure (control).
- The primary outcome was de novo SUI at 3 months, defined by validated questionnaires, stress tests, or SUI treatment.
Main Results:
- Postoperative de novo SUI occurred in 50.0% of the colposuspension group and 41.7% of the control group (P = 0.555).
- No significant differences were observed in urinary frequency, urgency incontinence, or urinary retention between groups at 3 months.
- The study met its sample size target to detect a 15% superiority margin.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic retropubic colposuspension was not superior to no anti-incontinence procedure in preventing de novo SUI after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
- The findings suggest that routine addition of this procedure may not be beneficial for stress-continent patients.
- Further research may explore alternative strategies for SUI prevention in this population.

