Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Residual SYNTAX score and outcomes after TAVR+PCI versus SAVR+CABG: a propensity-matched, gender-based comparison
Max Potratz1,2, Vera Fortmeier3, Katharina Höflsauer3
1Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Herz und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany MPotratz@hdz-nrw.de.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows better outcomes when residual coronary artery disease (CAD) is low (rSS <8). Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes depend more on patient risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist.
- Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is traditional, while transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used.
- Optimal revascularisation strategy, especially concerning residual CAD burden, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the impact of residual SYNTAX score (rSS) on outcomes in patients with AS and CAD.
- Compare outcomes between TAVR+PCI and SAVR+CABG, considering gender differences.
- Evaluate the prognostic importance of rSS in different revascularisation strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of propensity score-matched cohorts.
- Included patients with AS and CAD undergoing either TAVR+PCI or SAVR+CABG.
- Matching variables included age, ejection fraction, EuroSCORE II, and CAD severity.
Main Results:
- Residual SYNTAX score (rSS) predicted outcomes in the TAVR+PCI group but not in the SAVR+CABG group.
- TAVR+PCI was linked to lower composite endpoint rates when rSS <8, irrespective of gender.
- TAVR+PCI showed safety benefits: lower major bleeding in men and lower stroke rates in women.
Conclusions:
- The prognostic value of rSS is dependent on the chosen revascularisation strategy.
- Achieving an rSS <8 is crucial for improved outcomes in TAVR+PCI procedures.
- Prognosis after SAVR+CABG is primarily influenced by baseline clinical risk factors.
Background:
Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist, requiring careful revascularisation strategy consideration. While surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is traditional, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) plus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used. The optimal strategy, particularly regarding residual CAD burden, remains unclear.
Objectives:
This study investigated the impact of residual SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (rSS) on outcomes in men and women with AS and CAD undergoing TAVR+PCI versus SAVR+CABG.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, propensity score-matched cohorts of men and women undergoing either procedure were analysed. Matching variables included age, left ventricular ejection fraction, EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) and CAD severity.
Results:
398 patients (114 women and 284 men) were included. The rSS was predictive of the primary composite endpoint in the TAVR+PCI group (p=0.006 women and p<0.001 men) but not in the SAVR+CABG group. In patients achieving an rSS<8, TAVR+PCI was associated with a lower combined endpoint rate compared with SAVR+CABG, consistent across genders (p=0.02). Furthermore, TAVR+PCI demonstrated significant safety benefits, including lower rates of major bleeding in men (2.1% vs 10.6%) and stroke in women (1.8% vs 12.3%).
Conclusions:
The prognostic importance of the rSS is strategy-dependent. For patients undergoing TAVR+PCI, achieving extensive revascularisation (rSS <8) is a critical procedural goal associated with improved outcomes. For patients undergoing SAVR+CABG, prognosis appears driven more by baseline clinical risk.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Odds Ratio
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

