Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Detection and Quantification of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide CGRP in Human Plasma Using a Modified Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Published on: June 16, 2023
[False elevations of C-reactive protein: When should they be considered?]
Victor Marin1, Justine Claverie2, Selen Kalkan2
1Service de biochimie, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Université Bordeaux, INSERM, BMC, U1034, 33600 Pessac, France.
Introduction:
C-reactive protein (CRP) is the key biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory conditions. However, challenges arise when patients exhibit elevated CRP levels without an evident inflammatory cause. Despite the performance of CRP assays using immunoturbidimetry, this method remains sensitive to interferences that may result in false positive results.
Case Reports:
Drawing from three case studies illustrating analytical interferences in CRP measurements, we propose a comprehensive review of the literature on this subject. The most common cause of analytical interference in CRP measurement is the binding of rheumatoid factor to capture antibodies, generating a signal detected by immunoturbidimetry despite the absence of CRP in the sample. To identify such interferences, various antibody neutralization techniques and alternative assay methods can be employed. Reporting falsely elevated CRP levels may lead to unnecessary and potentially invasive diagnostic procedures, causing undue patient anxiety. Moreover, erroneous laboratory results can result in diagnostic errors or the initiation of inappropriate therapies, contributing to patient harm and additional healthcare costs.
Conclusion:
Unexplained and persistent elevation of CRP levels, particularly in the absence of other inflammatory markers and clinical evidence, should raise suspicion of analytical interference and prompt immediate discussion between clinicians and medical biologists to clarify the situation.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests