Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
English general practice in a period of change: a mixed-methods study of staff and patient perspectives
Heather Gage1, Alice Herron2, Bridget Jones2
1Surrey Health Economics Centre, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK h.gage@surrey.ac.uk.
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread use of remote (telephone and online) communication in general practice in England, which exacerbated long-term pressures from staffing shortages. The public perceived problems with access.
Aim:
To explore patient and staff perspectives on changing processes in general practice.
Design & Setting:
A mixed-methods study (patient survey and staff focus groups) in a sample of 22 general practices in England, varied by size, region, deprivation, and demography, was conducted in 2022.
Method:
An online survey was delivered by short message service (SMS) text to adult patients at 21 practices. Data from answers to an open-ended question about patients' experiences were analysed using summative content and thematic analysis. Virtual focus groups conducted with four categories of staff (GPs, nurses, receptionists and administrators, and practice managers) covered teamworking, roles, patient interactions, adapting to change, and workload. Data were transcribed and analysed using framework and thematic methods. Themes common to patients and staff were identified.
Results:
Overall median survey response was 10.9% (interquartile range 9.7%-14.6%); 14 401 patient responders provided 10 348 comments, 51.2% were positive. Patient and staff perspectives overlapped in two areas. The first, 'contact and communication', encapsulated differing views around access. The second, 'non-clinical roles and patient care', concerned the allocation of appointments and the roles of receptionists. Patients reported barriers to getting timely appointments with their chosen professional while staff were seeking ways to manage the volume of communications. Use of non-clinical staff to triage appointment requests was unpopular with patients and receptionists felt clinically unqualified.
Conclusion:
Effective methods are needed to improve patient communication with practices and access. Receptionists require recognition and training for their pivotal role.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Data Collection II