Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

06:39
Use of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation to Assess the Origin of Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Published on: October 3, 2018
10.1K
Sequential versus standard conditioning in untreated MDS patients with blasts undergoing allogeneic HSCT
Radwan Massoud1, Evgeny Klyuchnikov1, Normann Steiner1,2
1Department of Stem cell transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bone Marrow Transplantation
|October 1, 2025
Summary
The FLAMSA-FB regimen did not improve transplant outcomes for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients compared to standard conditioning. However, it was associated with a higher risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Transplantation Immunology
Background:
- Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) can progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), often necessitating allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT).
- The sequential FLAMSA-FB regimen, comprising a FLAMSA cytoreductive phase followed by fludarabine-busulfan (FB) conditioning, has been proposed to enhance disease control in MDS patients undergoing allo-SCT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the sequential FLAMSA-FB conditioning regimen compared to standard conditioning regimens in untreated MDS patients undergoing allo-SCT.
- To assess outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR).
- To investigate the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients receiving FLAMSA-FB versus standard conditioning.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 106 untreated MDS patients with 5-19% blasts who underwent allo-SCT.
- Patients received either the FLAMSA-FB regimen (n=45) or standard conditioning regimens (n=61), including Thiotepa-Busulfan, Fludarabine-Busulfan, or Treosulfan-Fludarabine.
- Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between groups, with a median follow-up of 24 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in two-year OS (62% vs. 68%, p=0.92), PFS (56% vs. 59%, p=0.92), NRM (22% vs. 25%, p=0.78), or CIR (22% vs. 13%, p=0.12) between the FLAMSA-FB and standard conditioning groups.
- Engraftment rates and the incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD were similar between the groups.
- However, the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD was significantly higher in the FLAMSA-FB group (50% vs. 17%, p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- The sequential FLAMSA-FB conditioning regimen did not demonstrate improved transplant outcomes compared to standard conditioning regimens in this cohort of MDS patients.
- While FLAMSA-FB did not impact survival or relapse rates, it was associated with an increased risk of developing moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD.
- Further research may be warranted to explore modifications or alternative strategies to mitigate the risk of chronic GVHD when using FLAMSA-based conditioning in MDS transplantation.

