Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Evaluating the use of red flags by online symptom checkers
Shailen Sutaria1, Delanjathan Devakumar2, Poppy Mallinson3
1Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. Shailen.sutaria@lshtm.ac.uk.
Background:
Online Symptom Checkers (OSCs) are digital health tools providing triage, diagnostic, and self-care advice based on user reported symptoms. Amidst global trends of increasing demand and workforce shortages, OSCs have the potential to alleviate primary care workload. However, their ability to seek red flag symptoms, a critical marker of a safe consultation in primary care, remains unexplored. Using clinical vignettes, this study evaluates OSCs' performance in seeking red flag symptoms compared to Primary Care Physicians (PCPs).
Methods:
Four OSCs (Ada, Babylon, Symptomate, Healthily) were evaluated using 51 clinical vignettes. Two standard setters used guidelines to determine which vignettes required emergency triage and identified the relevant red flags symptoms for the remaining vignettes. Two laypersons entered data from vignettes into OSCs and outputs were collected following a standardised form. The same vignettes were independently assessed by PCPs to compare triage accuracy and red flag identification. Summary statistics and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Wilson Score intervals, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare performance between OSCs and PCPs.
Results:
Of the 51 clinical vignettes, standard setters determined 14 to require emergency triage and the remaining 37 vignettes suitable for primary care triage. Of the primary care triaged vignettes, standard setters identified a total of 77 relevant red flag symptoms to be sought. Of the 14 emergency vignettes, PCPs correctly triaged 85.7% (95% CI: 74.3-92.6%) of cases compared to OSCs 76.9% (95% CI: 59.3-87.9%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.299). Specificity, the proportion of correctly triaged primary care vignettes, PCPs performed significantly better compared to OSCs, 91.9% (95%CI 78.9-97.0%) vs. 83.3% (95%CI 68.1-91.9%), p = 0.024.
Conclusions:
OSCs demonstrated comparable ability to appropriately triage clinical vignettes requiring emergency triage as PCPs, however, were less specific, triaging more primary care vignettes as emergency. OSCs do not seek the majority of red flags. This raises concerns about their safety and effectiveness in primary care. OSCs developers should focus on improving OSCs' red flag coverage to ensure safe integration into primary care settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck

