Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The ecology-evolution continuum and the origin of life.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2023

Same author

The information geometry of two-field functional integrals.

Information geometry·2022

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Science of the gaps.

Eric Smith¹, Alicja Kubica²

¹Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences

|October 2, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Evaluating speculative hypotheses on the origin of life is challenging due to knowledge gaps. Making causal frameworks explicit offers a more systematic approach to reasoning through these complex questions.

Keywords:

causality falsificationism logical empiricism origin of life pragmatism scenario

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between Field Observations and Lab Manipulations in Larval Ecology Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

Area of Science:

Astrobiology
Origin of Life Research
Philosophy of Science

Background:

The origin of life is a complex scientific problem.
Existing scientific methods struggle with speculative hypotheses due to missing knowledge ('gaps').
Historical contingency and life's complexity exacerbate these challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate and expand speculative hypotheses concerning the origin of life.
To address the limitations of traditional scientific empiricism in areas with significant knowledge gaps.
To propose improved methods for reasoning about fragmentary and speculative hypotheses.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the role of 'gaps' (missing knowledge/ideas) in origin of life research.
Examination of the utility of scientific empiricism versus alternative criteria (e.g., metaphor) for speculative hypotheses.
Investigation into the function of scenarios in justifying hypotheses related to chance, necessity, and causation.
Development of explicit causal frameworks for hypothesis evaluation.

Main Results:

Traditional empiricism is less effective for origin of life hypotheses due to 'gaps'.
Metaphor and other weaker criteria often motivate reasoning in these areas.
Explicit causal frameworks enhance systematic reasoning for speculative hypotheses compared to scenarios.
Scenarios play a role in justifying hypotheses concerning chance, necessity, and causation.

Conclusions:

Reasoning about the origin of life requires methods beyond standard scientific empiricism.
Making causal frameworks explicit provides a more robust foundation for speculative hypotheses.
This approach facilitates more systematic evaluation and expansion of origin of life theories.