Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
Published on: July 22, 2025
A comparative assessment of molecular-based prognostic models in CMML
Luis E Aguirre1,2, Najla Al Ali3, Somedeb Ball4
1Division of Leukemia, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
The molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) accurately predicts outcomes in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). This system, along with the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS)-Mol, offers improved risk stratification for patients with CMML.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) requires accurate prognostic systems for risk stratification and treatment guidance.
- Existing systems integrate clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular data, but novel molecular-based models show promise.
- The molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) was developed for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and its utility in CMML warrants investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability and prognostic accuracy of the IPSS-M in patients with CMML.
- To comprehensively compare the IPSS-M against other major molecular-based prognostic models in CMML.
- To assess the predictive validity of these models in patients receiving hypomethylating agent therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular data from 340 CMML patients.
- Application and comparison of IPSS-M, Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS)-Mol, CPSS, Mayo molecular, and Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies models.
- Assessment of overall survival (OS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution.
Main Results:
- IPSS-M stratified CMML patients into 6 risk categories with significantly different median OS and 4-year AML evolution rates (P < .001 and P = .008, respectively).
- Both CPSS-Mol and IPSS-M demonstrated superior OS discrimination compared to older models.
- CPSS-Mol showed the highest accuracy for predicting leukemic evolution, while IPSS-M exhibited comparable prognostic accuracy to CPSS-Mol and was reliably applicable in CMML.
Conclusions:
- The IPSS-M is a valid and reliable tool for risk stratification in CMML, comparable in accuracy to CPSS-Mol.
- Molecular-based prognostic models, including IPSS-M, improve risk assessment in CMML.
- These models maintain predictive validity in patients treated with hypomethylating agents, supporting their use in clinical decision-making, especially in community settings.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

