Receipt of PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1/2 Alterations

Micah Ostrowski1, Yeonjung Jo2, Chadi Hage Chehade1

  • 1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

JAMA Network Open
|October 2, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Approximately half of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and BRCA1/2 alterations did not receive poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Increased awareness of survival data and access to these therapies is needed for eligible mCRPC patients.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with BRCA1/2 alterations are candidates for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.
  • PARP inhibitors have demonstrated survival benefits in clinical trials for this patient population.
  • Limited data exist on the actual uptake of PARP inhibitors in eligible mCRPC patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utilization patterns of PARP inhibitors in patients diagnosed with mCRPC and harboring BRCA1/2 alterations.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Flatiron-Health electronic health record database.
  • Included were mCRPC patients with BRCA1/2 alterations alive after August 15, 2020.
  • Multivariable logistic regression analyzed associations between patient characteristics (age, race, insurance, practice type) and PARP inhibitor receipt.

Main Results:

  • Out of 443 eligible mCRPC patients with BRCA1/2 alterations, 51.2% received a PARP inhibitor.
  • Patients with Medicare insurance were more likely to receive a PARP inhibitor compared to those with commercial insurance (OR, 1.91; P=.047).
  • No significant difference in PARP inhibitor uptake was observed between community and academic practice settings (OR, 1.64; P=.05).

Conclusions:

  • Nearly half of mCRPC patients with BRCA1/2 alterations did not receive PARP inhibitors, despite proven survival benefits.
  • Findings underscore the need for enhanced awareness regarding survival data and improved access to PARP inhibitors for this group.
  • Strategies to increase the uptake of life-prolonging PARP inhibitors in mCRPC patients are warranted.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
8.6K
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression03:03

mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression

The mammalian target of rapamycin or mTOR protein was discovered in 1994 due to its direct interaction with rapamycin. The protein gets its name from a yeast homolog called TOR. The mTOR protein complex in mammalian cells plays a major role in balancing anabolic processes such as the synthesis of proteins, lipids, and nucleotides and catabolic processes, such as autophagy in response to environmental cues, such as availability of nutrients and growth factors.
The mTOR pathway or the...
4.6K
Inhibition of Cdk Activity02:34

Inhibition of Cdk Activity

The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
5.5K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.8K