Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Transcriptional repression by TGIF2 coordinates neurogenic priming and neural stem cell maintenance.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Cilia beating of ependymal cells regulates adult neural stem cell quiescence via mechanical forces mediated by PKD1/2-TRPM3.

Neuron·2026

Same author

Chromosomal instability promotes cell migration and invasion via EFEMP1 secretion into extracellular vesicles.

The EMBO journal·2026

Same author

Chromosomal instability shapes the tumor microenvironment of esophageal adenocarcinoma via a cGAS-chemokine-myeloid axis.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Mitotic BLM functions are required to maintain genomic stability.

Nucleic acids research·2026

Same author

DNA methylation influences human centromere positioning and function.

Nature genetics·2025

Same journal

Unlocking the capacity of Mn-based Prussian blue cathodes in capacitive deionization.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Scaling biodiversity-stability relationships from populations to meta-communities across trophic levels.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Thermodynamically programmed one-pot CRISPR platform for point-of-care SNP genotyping.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Engineering all-organic electrocatalysts with asymmetric dual-active sites for uncommon oxygen-evolving pathway.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Rapid GC content evolution in rice through GC-biased gene conversion and selection for translation efficiency.

Nature communications·2026

Same journal

Declines in organic matter persistence with increased soil carbon.

Nature communications·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

Benchmarking scRNA-seq copy number variation callers.

Katharina T Schmid¹, Aikaterini Symeonidi^1,2, Dmytro Hlushchenko¹

¹Biomedical Center (BMC), Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.

Nature Communications

|October 2, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study benchmarks computational tools for identifying copy number variations (CNVs) from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Performance varies by dataset, with allelic methods showing robustness for large datasets.

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing

Published on: February 17, 2017

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Cancer Research

Background:

Copy number variations (CNVs) are crucial genomic alterations linked to diseases like cancer.
Single-cell technologies enable detailed analysis of CNV heterogeneity and tumor subclones.
Existing computational tools for CNV detection from scRNA-seq data lack independent benchmarking.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct an independent evaluation of popular computational methods for CNV detection in scRNA-seq data.
To assess the accuracy of these methods in identifying true CNVs, euploid cells, and subclonal structures.
To provide a benchmarking pipeline for selecting optimal methods for new scRNA-seq datasets.

Main Methods:

Evaluation of six popular CNV detection tools using 21 scRNA-seq datasets.
Analysis of dataset-specific factors influencing method performance, including size, CNV characteristics, and reference data.
Comparison of method robustness, runtime, and additional functionalities.

Main Results:

Method performance is significantly influenced by dataset size, CNV complexity, and reference dataset choice.
Tools incorporating allelic information demonstrate superior robustness for large, droplet-based scRNA-seq datasets, albeit with increased computational cost.
Identified variations in additional functionalities across the evaluated methods.

Conclusions:

No single method universally excels; optimal tool selection is dataset-dependent.
Allelic information is critical for robust CNV detection in large-scale scRNA-seq studies.
The developed benchmarking pipeline aids in method selection and can inform future tool development for improved CNV analysis.