Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026
CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Restoring Dystrophin Expression in iPSC-Derived Muscle Progenitors
Published on: September 14, 2019
Spatiotemporal analysis of dystrophin expression during muscle repair
John C W Hildyard1, Liberty E Roskrow2, Dominic J Wells3
1Comparative Neuromuscular Diseases Laboratory, Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. jhildyard@rvc.ac.uk.
Background:
Dystrophin mRNA is produced from a very large genetic locus and transcription of a single mRNA requires approximately 16 h. This prolonged interval between initiation and completion results in unusual transcriptional behaviour: in skeletal muscle, myonuclei express dystrophin continuously and robustly, yet degrade mature transcripts shortly after completion. Consequently, most dystrophin mRNA is nascent, not mature. This implies expression is principally controlled post-transcriptionally, a mechanism that circumvents transcriptional delay, allowing rapid responses to change in demand. Dystrophin protein is however highly stable, with slow turnover: in healthy muscle, despite constant production of dystrophin mRNA, demand is low and the need for responsive expression is minimal. We reasoned this system instead exists to control dystrophin expression during rare periods of elevated but changing demand, such as during muscle development or repair, when newly formed fibres must establish sarcolemmal dystrophin rapidly.
Methods:
We assessed dystrophin mRNA (both nascent and mature) and dystrophin protein in regenerating skeletal muscle following injury, using a combination of qPCR, immunofluorescence and in-situ hybridisation to determine timing and location of expression during the repair process.
Results:
We reveal a complex program that suggests control at multiple levels: nascent transcription is detectable even prior to overt myoblast fusion, suggesting cells 'pay in advance' to minimise subsequent delay. During myotube differentiation and maturation, when sarcolemmal demands are high, initiation increases only modestly while mature transcript stability increases markedly to generate high numbers of mature dystrophin transcripts, a state that persists until repair is complete, when oversupply and degradation resumes.
Conclusion:
Our data demonstrate that dystrophin mRNA is indeed chiefly controlled by turnover, not initiation: degradation consequently represents a potential therapeutic target for maximising efficacy of even modest dystrophin restoration.
