Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Suicide and Self-Harm in Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sara Lindstedt1, Christian Rück1, Tatja Hirvikoski1,2,3
1Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background:
Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) are disproportionately exposed to several risk factors for suicidality. However, no meta-analysis has yet quantified the relative risk of suicide and self-harm, including suicide attempts, within this population. The aim of this project was to bring together and synthesise the research on suicidality among individuals with ID.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out. Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycInfo were searched from inception through 4 August 2025. Observational studies with a quantitative design, evaluating the relative risk of suicide or self-harm, including suicide attempts, in individuals with and without ID, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using a shortened version of the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Exposure (ROBINS-E) checklist. A random effects model was used to synthesise the results.
Results:
Eleven primary studies were included in the review (n = 241 438). The level of ID severity was only presented in two articles. Compared to the general population, the pooled relative risk for death by suicide was 0.54 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.89, k = 6, I2 = 77%) and the relative risk for self-harm was 3.16, (95% CI 2.3 to 4.35, k = 6, I2 = 89%).
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that individuals with ID have an elevated risk of self-harm but a lower risk of dying by suicide compared to the general population. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of primary studies and substantial between-study heterogeneity. Further, separate analyses of mild versus moderate-to-profound ID are warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Self-Discrepancy Theory

