Iron, manganese, and copper complexes protect saccharomyces cerevisiae from methyl methanesulfonate-induced

Larissa M M Mattos1,2, Davi A Andrade3,4, Alan N S Alves3,4

  • 1Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. larissamattos@pos.iq.ufrj.br.

Insights

Synthetic antioxidants with iron, manganese, and copper protect yeast from methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) DNA damage. These compounds mitigate MMS-induced toxicity, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis, with copper complex showing the highest efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Genetics
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) is a potent alkylating agent causing DNA damage, mutagenesis, and cellular dysfunction.
  • Developing protective agents against MMS is crucial for understanding DNA repair and mitigating genotoxic effects.
  • Synthetic antioxidants offer potential strategies to counteract alkylating agent-induced cellular damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the protective potential of synthetic antioxidant complexes containing iron, manganese, and copper against MMS-induced damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
  • To investigate the impact of these complexes on yeast survival, mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis.
  • To determine the relative efficacy of different metal-containing complexes in mitigating MMS toxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized wild-type (BY4741) and DNA-repair mutant (rad9Δ, rad54Δ) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
  • Exposed yeast strains to MMS and treated with iron (1), manganese (2), or copper (3) complexes.
  • Assessed survival rates, mitochondrial dysfunction, intracellular oxidation levels, and canavanine mutagenesis.

Main Results:

  • All tested metal complexes significantly improved yeast survival rates against MMS exposure.
  • Treatment with complexes reduced MMS-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, intracellular oxidation, and mutagenesis.
  • Complex 3 (copper) demonstrated the highest protective efficacy, followed by complex 2 (manganese) and complex 1 (iron).

Conclusions:

  • Synthetic antioxidant complexes effectively protect Saccharomyces cerevisiae from MMS-induced DNA damage and toxicity.
  • These metal-containing compounds mitigate oxidative stress and genotoxicity associated with alkylating agents.
  • The findings highlight the potential of these coordination compounds as cellular defense enhancers against genotoxic agents.

Related Concept Videos

Sulfur Assimilation01:20

Sulfur Assimilation

Sulfur is an essential element in biological systems, contributing to synthesizing key biomolecules, including amino acids such as cysteine and methionine, and cofactors such as coenzyme A and biotin. Microorganisms primarily assimilate sulfur as sulfate (SO₄²⁻) from the environment, which must undergo a series of biochemical transformations before it can be incorporated into cellular components. As sulfate is highly oxidized, it must undergo assimilatory sulfate reduction to...
319
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II01:46

Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II

The mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) is the main energy generation system in the eukaryotic cells. However, mitochondria also produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to the large electron flow during oxidative phosphorylation. While Complex I is one of the primary sources of superoxide radicals, ROS production by Complex II is uncommon and may only be observed in cancer cells with mutated complexes.
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
18.4K
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.9K