Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
A Comparative Study of Consistency on 1.5-T to 3.0-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging Conversion
Jie Li1, Yujie Zhang2, Jingang Chen2
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Purposes:
Deep learning methods were employed to perform harmonization analysis on whole-brain scans obtained from 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners, aiming to increase comparability between different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.
Methods:
Thirty patients evaluated in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between August 2020 and March 2023 were included in this retrospective study. Three MRI scanners were used to scan patients, and automated brain image segmentation was performed to obtain volumes of different brain regions. Differences in regional volumes across scanners were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. For regions showing significant differences, super-resolution deep learning was applied to enhance consistency, with subsequent comparison of results. For regions still exhibiting differences, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated and the consistency was evaluated using Cicchetti's criteria.
Results:
Average whole-brain volumes for different scanners among patients were 1152.36mm3 (SD = 95.34), 1136.92mm3 (SD = 108.21), and 1184.00mm3 (SD = 102.78), respectively. Analysis revealed significant variations in all 12 brain regions (p<0.05), indicating a lack of comparability among imaging results obtained from different magnetic field strengths. After deep learning-based consistency optimization, most brain regions showed no significant differences, except for six regions where differences remained significant. Among these, three regions demonstrated ICC values of 0.868 (95%CI 0.771-0.931), 0.776 (95%CI 0.634-0.877), and 0.893 (95%CI 0.790-0.947), indicating high reproducibility and comparability.
Conclusion:
This study employed a novel machine learning approach that significantly improved the comparability of imaging results from patients using different magnetic field strengths and various models of MRI scanners. Furthermore, it enhanced the consistency of central nervous system image segmentation.
More Related Videos
09:30Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...