Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Treatment Package without Escape Extinction to Address Food Selectivity
Published on: August 21, 2015
"A few more bites?": Manifestation of pressure-to-eat in child care
Heather Podanovitch1, Julie E Campbell1,2, Melissa D Rossiter3
1Early Childhood Collaborative Research Centre, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Insights
Pressuring children to eat in childcare overrides hunger cues, potentially causing eating issues. Educators most commonly encouraged eating without asking about hunger, with less pressure observed from older, more experienced staff.
Area of Science:
- Child Nutrition
- Early Childhood Education
- Feeding Practices
Background:
- Pressure-to-eat tactics in childcare can disrupt children's natural hunger and satiety signals.
- This disruption may lead to disordered eating patterns, including overeating, undereating, and food refusal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and describe the specific ways early childhood educators apply pressure to eat.
- To analyze the prevalence of different pressure-to-eat strategies used in childcare settings.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative content analysis of observational data from 9 childcare centers.
- Coding and counting of observed educator behaviors related to pressure-to-eat.
- Quantitative assessment of pressure types against educator demographics using nonparametric tests.
Main Results:
- The most frequent pressure tactic involved offering food and encouraging eating without regard for hunger or satiety cues.
- Serving food without confirming the child's hunger was a primary example of this common pressure.
- Pressure referencing health benefits/consequences was the least common tactic.
- Increasing educator age and years of experience correlated with less frequent pressure-to-eat behaviors.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the types and frequency of pressure-to-eat is crucial for developing effective interventions.
- Findings can guide the creation of more responsive and supportive feeding environments in childcare.
- This research highlights the need for training educators on sensitive feeding practices.
Aims:
Pressuring children to eat can override hunger and satiety cues, which may lead to over- or under-eating and food refusal. This study aims to describe the manifestations of pressure-to-eat in child care from early childhood educators.
Methods:
A secondary data analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis. Observations of educators from child care centres in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (n = 9) occurred over 2 days. Observation data were coded and counted to determine the most and least prevalent forms of pressure. The count results were then assessed quantitatively by educator demographic characteristics to explore potential associations using nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlations).
Results:
Offering food and encouraging eating without referencing hunger or satiety was found to be the most common type of pressure; serving children without asking if they were hungry made up the majority of this type of pressure. This was less common with both increasing educator age (r = -0.692, p = 0.039), as well as years of experience (r = 0.878, p = 0.002). Pressuring children to eat by referring to health benefits and consequences was the least common type of pressure.
Conclusion:
This study provides insight into the types and frequency of pressure-to-eat strategies implemented in child care centres, which can inform interventions to create more responsive feeding environments.
Related Concept Videos
Bulimia Nervosa
Binge Eating Disorders
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Regulation of Food Intake
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

