Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconsideration of the anatomical structure of the buccal fat pad.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2025
Same author

Self-portrait distortion by selfies: Increased desire for aesthetic surgery among millennials?

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2020
Same author

An adjuvant technique using a drape and button in eyelid surgery.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2014
Same author

The inverted Batman incision: a new incision in transcolumellar incision for open rhinoplasty.

Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery·2013
Same author

The boomerang osteotomy -- a new method of reduction malarplasty.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2012
Same author

An anatomical study on the position of the summit of the zygoma: theoretical bases for reduction malarplasty.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2011
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.5K

Three-Dimensional Simulation Accuracy and Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty.

Kosaku Yamamichi, Yuji Nakanishi, Chien Ying Chen

    Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum
    |October 6, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary

    Three-dimensional (3D) simulation accuracy in rhinoplasty strongly correlates with patient satisfaction. This technology aids in aligning surgical outcomes with patient expectations, improving the overall aesthetic result.

    More Related Videos

    Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
    08:18

    Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

    Published on: May 16, 2025

    614
    A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
    10:42

    A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

    Published on: January 28, 2020

    6.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
    06:18

    Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

    Published on: April 5, 2024

    1.5K
    Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
    08:18

    Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures

    Published on: May 16, 2025

    614
    A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
    10:42

    A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

    Published on: January 28, 2020

    6.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Medical Simulation
    • Aesthetic Medicine

    Background:

    • Effective communication of expected outcomes is crucial for patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty.
    • Three-dimensional (3D) simulation offers a promising method for aligning patient expectations with surgical plans.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the relationship between the accuracy of 3D simulations and patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty.
    • To assess the efficacy of the Crisalix simulation platform in predicting rhinoplasty outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • A retrospective study of 38 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty with preoperative 3D simulation.
    • Morphometric analysis compared simulated nasal parameters with postoperative results.
    • Patient satisfaction assessed via FACE-Q scale; similarity scores rated by patients and surgeons.

    Main Results:

    • 3D simulation accuracy showed a strong correlation with patient satisfaction (ρ = 0.66, P < .001), closely following physician scores (ρ = 0.71, P < .001).
    • Revision cases exhibited greater simulation discrepancies and lower satisfaction, though not statistically significant.

    Conclusions:

    • Higher predictive accuracy of 3D preoperative simulations is significantly linked to increased patient satisfaction.
    • 3D simulation is a valuable tool for aligning surgical outcomes with patient expectations and enhancing shared decision-making.