Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in diagnosing and managing temporomandibular disorders: A systematic
Vaishnavi Rajaraman1, Deepak Nallaswamy1, Amrutha Shenoy1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have recently emerged as promising tools for enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
Objective:
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI/ML models in detecting TMDs through a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature.
Methods:
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies assessing the diagnostic performance of AI/ML models in TMD diagnosis (PROSPERO-CRD420251035080). Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers using the AXIS tool for cross-sectional and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy was performed using pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic.
Results:
The systematic search identified 368 articles, of which 12 studies met inclusion criteria after screening. Risk of bias assessment showed most observational studies had low to unclear bias, while cross-sectional studies varied from moderate to high quality. Five studies were eligible for meta-analysis and they revealed that AI and machine learning models achieved a pooled sensitivity of 87.1 %(95 %CI:84.9 %-89.2 %) and specificity of 87.0 %(95 %CI:84.8 %-89.2 %) for TMD diagnosis. The diagnostic odds ratio was 45.1(95 %CI:30.5-66.8), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.96, indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Moderate heterogeneity I2 = 38.7 %.
Conclusion:
AI/ML models demonstrate excellent accuracy in differentiating patients with and without TMDs, reinforcing their potential as reliable diagnostic aids in clinical and screening settings. However, variability in input features and lack of standardized model development protocols highlight the need for future research focusing on validation across diverse populations and harmonization of diagnostic criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

