Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Validation of VaxEstim, a Bayesian model for rapid estimation of measles-mumps-rubella vaccination coverage at
Rosemary A Martoma1,2,3,4, Joshua C Martoma3,5, Maimuna S Majumder1,6
1Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
Accurate estimation of vaccination coverage at the onset of an outbreak is critical for guiding timely public health responses. Conventional methods often rely on delayed or incomplete data that obscure immunity gaps. During the 2022-2023 central Ohio measles outbreak, Columbus Public Health estimated measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) coverage at 80-90% despite incomplete reporting. Martoma et al. developed VaxEstim, a statistical model that generated an early estimate of two-dose MMR coverage in the outbreak-exposed population at 53.0% (95% credible interval [CrI] 21.0-77.0) using limited publicly available case-based data. A subsequent epidemiological investigation by Martoma et al. defined the outbreak-exposed population as children <15 years of age, of Somali descent, residing in Columbus (Ohio, USA), and receiving care within a primary care network (PCN).
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional validation study using electronic medical records from the PCN of 133,476 children <15 years of age. This cohort included 9864 children of Somali descent residing in Columbus, who comprised the previously defined outbreak-exposed population. Two-dose MMR coverage was defined as ≥2 valid doses by the outbreak onset date of October 8, 2022. VaxEstim's predicted coverage was compared with observed coverage in this group.
Findings:
Observed two-dose MMR coverage among the outbreak-exposed population was 42.4% (4181 of 9864; 95% CI 41.4-43.4), compared with VaxEstim's early-phase prediction of 53.0% (95% CrI 21.0-77.0). The wide credible interval reflects uncertainty typical of early outbreak phases. Model performance showed a mean absolute error of 0.106 and a mean squared error of 0.0113.
Interpretation:
This study externally validates the VaxEstim prediction against observed coverage in this outbreak-exposed population. The model accurately predicted substantial underimmunisation, underscoring its potential to guide rapid, targeted public health action.
Funding:
National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation.
More Related Videos
09:08Developing a Salivary Antibody Multiplex Immunoassay to Measure Human Exposure to Environmental Pathogens
Published on: September 12, 2016
06:26Author Spotlight: Optimizing CFU Determination for Efficient Assessment of TB Vaccine Efficacy and Antigen Presentation Analysis
Published on: July 28, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Estimating Population Standard Deviation
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...