Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Clinical Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Patients and Older Adults
Published on: November 7, 2014
Validity of Poststroke Gait Spatiotemporal and Joint Excursion Metrics Between Inertial Measurement Units and a
Heather L Knight1, Ethan B Schonhaut1, Camden J Jacobs1
1College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) show good validity for comparing average post-stroke gait parameters between systems. However, stride-by-stride gait variability metrics from IMUs require cautious interpretation due to lower validity.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Rehabilitation Technology
- Neurology
Background:
- Chronic stroke survivors often exhibit altered gait patterns, including spatiotemporal parameters and joint excursions.
- These gait metrics are crucial targets for rehabilitation interventions.
- Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer a portable solution for quantifying gait outside clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of IMU-based gait metrics compared to marker-based systems in individuals with chronic stroke.
- To assess the agreement between IMU and marker-based systems for both average gait parameters and stride-by-stride variability.
- To determine the suitability of IMU data for clinical gait analysis and intervention targeting.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-one individuals with chronic stroke participated in the study.
- Gait analysis was performed using both IMU and marker-based systems during treadmill walking.
- Validity was assessed by comparing metrics across participants (average parameters) and within participants (stride-by-stride variance).
Main Results:
- Across-participant analysis showed excellent or good validity for most joint excursion metrics, supporting comparison with population norms.
- Within-participant analysis revealed excellent validity for stride duration but only poor to fair validity for stride length and most joint excursions.
- This indicates that IMU-based stride-by-stride gait variability measures should be used with caution.
Conclusions:
- IMU-based gait metrics demonstrate good validity for characterizing average gait parameters in chronic stroke, enabling comparison with existing norms.
- The validity of IMU-derived stride-by-stride gait variability metrics is limited, necessitating careful interpretation in clinical practice.
- IMUs show promise for post-stroke gait assessment, but further refinement may be needed for precise stride-level analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement: Standard Units
Measurement: Derived Units
Conversion of Units
The first step in the unit conversion is to list the given units and the units required...
Distance Measurements by Taping
Distance Corrections
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

