Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Propofol-esketamine versus propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in pediatric flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy:
Xiaomei Wang1, Tingting Xie1, Dan Wang2
1Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Ningxia Medical University, Zhengyuan North Street, Jinfeng District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750000, China.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the incidence of transient hypoxemia between pediatric patients receiving either propofol/esketamine (PK) or propofol/fentanyl (PF) combination for sedation during bronchoscopy.
Methods:
This was a prospective study including a total of 84 pediatric patients who underwent pediatric flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB). The participants were randomly assigned to either the propofol/fentanyl group (Group PF, n = 42) or the propofol/esketamine group (Group PK, n = 42) for sedation and analgesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of transient hypoxemia, defined as oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 90% lasting for 10 s. Secondary outcomes comprised hemodynamics during the procedure, including blood pressure and heart rate changes, coughing, recovery time, dosage of propofol, incidence of adverse events, and level of bronchoscopist satisfaction.
Results:
The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly lower in the Group PK compared to the Group PF (14.3% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.042). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate, were lower in the Group PF compared to the Group PK (p < 0.05); however, this difference was not clinically significant. Furthermore, coughing episodes were significantly reduced in the Group PK compared to Group PF (9.5% vs. 28.6%; p < 0.01). The Group PK had shorter recovery times and required more propofol compared to the Group PF (p < 0.05). Bronchoscopist satisfaction level was higher in the Group PK than Group PF (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Propofol/esketamine sedation reduced the risk of hypoxemia during pediatric FFB compared to propofol/fentanyl, with additional benefits in cough suppression and hemodynamic stability. Therefore, the propofol/esketamine combination may offer a safer alternative for procedural sedation in pediatric FFB.
More Related Videos
07:54Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence