Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
Systematic review and comparison of measurement methods for determining the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on chest
Dana Belde1,2, Mattias Kettner2, Michael J Thali2
1Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Affiliated Hospital for Research and Teaching of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Zurich, Baden, Switzerland.
Background:
The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) is a widely used measurement on chest x-rays (CXR), yet its accuracy and consistency remain limited due to the lack of a standardized measurement method. This study aims to systematically identify and compare established CTR measurement methods from the literature and validate them against computed tomography (CT)-based measurements, which serve as a precise anatomical reference.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted for studies that reported CTR measurement methods on adult CXRs. Eight distinct measurement methods were identified. Five reproducible methods were selected and retrospectively applied to CXRs of 10 patients who also had chest CT scans. The CTRCXR values were compared with CTRCT measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with Friedman test and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc comparisons.
Results:
Systematic literature search yielded in 251 studies of which 38 were included. A total of 8 different measurement methods were identified. Comparative analysis showed significant differences between CTRCXR methods (Friedman test: χ2 = 27.104, df = 5, P <.001). Method 1 showed a statistically significant underestimation of CTR values compared to CT (adjusted P =.004), while Methods 4 and 6 demonstrated the smallest average deviation from CT measurements (3.64% and 4.42%, respectively) and no significant difference (adjusted P > .999).
Conclusion:
CTRCXR estimation is highly technique-dependent, with considerable variability across published methods. Methods using a midline reference for cardiac measurements and clearly defined anatomical landmarks for assessing thoracic width showed the strongest agreement with CT-based values. The results highlight the need for a standardized and reproducible CTR measurement protocol to ensure consistency and diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice. Based on our analysis, we strongly recommend using a midline reference for cardiac diameter measurements and suggest measuring the thoracic diameter along the internal rib margins at the level of either the left or right diaphragm dome.
More Related Videos
08:02Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
Published on: November 15, 2024
04:40Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:28Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
01:20Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:25Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
01:26Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
01:21Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI