Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Fertility Preservation Through Oocyte Vitrification: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives
Published on: September 16, 2021
Comparable Clinical and Embryological Outcomes in Luteal and Follicular Phase Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation: A
Feng Gao1, Nicolás Garrido2, Juan Manuel Mascarós Martínez2
1Kindbody - San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Objective:
To study whether luteal phase stimulation provides clinical and embryological outcomes comparable to follicular phase stimulation in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Subjects:
A total of 12,442 patients undergoing 18,062 in vitro fertilization cycles between January 1, 2018, and December 21, 2021, across 6 assisted reproductive technology centers within a large US fertility network.
Exposure:
Patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using either follicular phase or luteal phase initiation. Cycles involving fresh transfers, day 3 transfers, or poor endometrial receptivity were excluded.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates and cumulative live birth rates. The secondary outcomes included the number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, blastocyst biopsy rate, and euploid embryo rate.
Results:
The clinical pregnancy rates were similar between follicular (68.44%) and luteal (67.67%) phase stimulations (odds ratio, 0.975; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.751-1.266). Luteal phase stimulation required a higher total follicle-stimulating hormone dose (4,350.92 IU vs. 3,989.11 IU); however, stimulation duration did not differ significantly. Follicular phase stimulation yielded more oocytes on average (12.61 vs. 11.85), although luteal phase stimulation produced more oocytes in paired analyses (8.54 vs. 7.31). Among patients aged <35 years, the blastocyst biopsy rates were higher in luteal cycles (61.01% vs. 55.37%). No significant differences were found in the oocyte maturation, fertilization, or euploid embryo rates. The cumulative live birth rates were comparable across age groups and transfer attempts.
Conclusion:
Luteal phase stimulation offers clinical and embryological outcomes comparable to follicular phase stimulation in in vitro fertilization. In patients aged <35 years, it may provide higher blastocyst biopsy rates, supporting its use as a flexible and effective stimulation option.
More Related Videos
08:06Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Impact of Immediate Partial Removal of Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes on Fertilization Efficiency and Embryo Quality
Published on: October 18, 2024
06:40Collection of Human Follicular Fluid, Follicle Somatic Cells, and Immature Oocytes from Individuals Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization
Published on: October 24, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Ovarian Cycle
Hormonal Control of the Ovarian Cycle
Before puberty, the hypothalamus releases GnRH in a low frequency, low amplitude pulsatile manner. This along with the immature hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activity, results in low estrogen levels and the absence of a fully functional ovarian cycle. At puberty, GnRH secretion increases in both frequency and...
Oogenesis