Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Method of Studying Palatal Fusion using Static Organ Culture
Published on: September 19, 2015
Distinguishing syndromic and nonsyndromic cleft palate through analysis of protein-altering de novo variants in 818
Kelsey R Robinson1, Sarah W Curtis1, Justin E Paschall2
1Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Abstract:
De novo variants (DNs) are sporadically occurring variants found in an offspring but absent in both parents. DNs most commonly arise in the germline and are not under selective pressure; therefore, they may be enriched for disease-causing alleles. In fact, DNs have been implicated in multiple rare genetic disorders. Cleft palate (CP) is a craniofacial congenital anomaly occurring in ∼1 in 1,700 live births. Genome-wide association studies have found fewer than a dozen CP-specific loci, while exome and targeted sequencing studies in family-based and case-control cohorts often lack statistical power to conclusively identify causal variants. We therefore hypothesized that CP probands would be enriched for protein-altering DNs, which may explain the relative dearth in discovery. A complicating factor in understanding CP, however, is its phenotypically heterogeneous nature. As such, we aggregated sequence data for 818 trios with CP representing a combination of subtypes and isolated and syndromic presentations. We identified global enrichment of protein-altering DNs (1.48, p = 1.28 × 10-28) and exome-wide-significant (p < 1.3 × 10-6) gene-specific enrichment for SATB2, MEIS2, COL2A1, ZC4H2, EFTUD2, KAT6B, and ANKRD11. We found a statistically significant higher enrichment of protein-altering DNs in syndromic (1.70, p = 6.95 × 10-26) versus nonsyndromic (1.31, p = 8.51 × 10-8) probands but no differences between subtypes. We explored differences in gene-specific enrichment, finding some unique to syndromic probands (ZC4H2) or nonsyndromic probands (IRF6), as well as some shared between groups (SATB2). Altogether, we show that DNs are a contributor to CP risk and that combined analysis can enhance our ability to find genetic associations that would otherwise be undetected.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Karyotyping
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Pleiotropy