Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

09:11
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Published on: April 9, 2019
22.3K
Evaluation of a prostate SBRT planning workflow using auto-segmentation and knowledge-based planning
Trisha Jones1,2, Kirk Luca1, Mingdong Fan1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|October 8, 2025
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) contouring in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows promise for organs at risk but requires physician oversight for target volumes. Post-processed AI contours improve dosimetric outcomes when combined with physician-delineated targets.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demands precise target delineation and organ at risk (OAR) contouring for optimal treatment planning.
- Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) contouring into SBRT workflows offers potential for increased efficiency and accuracy.
- Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a sophisticated method for automating radiotherapy plan generation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the comparability of AI-generated contours versus physician-delineated contours in achieving dosimetric goals for prostate SBRT.
- To assess the accuracy of commercial AI contouring software for prostate, rectum, and bladder delineation.
- To determine the dosimetric impact of AI-generated OAR contours within a KBP framework.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 20 prostate cancer patients undergoing SBRT.
- Application of commercial AI contouring software to CT scans for prostate, rectum, and bladder.
- Comparison of AI contours with physician-delineated contours using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC), and Added Path Length (APL).
- Generation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans using an in-house prostate SBRT KBP model with different contouring inputs (clinical, AI, post-processed AI).
Main Results:
- AI prostate contours were deemed clinically unacceptable.
- AI rectum and bladder contours showed overlap with clinical prostate contours in a significant number of cases.
- While AI OARs initially caused minor dosimetric deviations, post-processing and recalculation on clinical contours led to acceptable plan quality, comparable to reference plans.
- Plans utilizing post-processed AI OARs demonstrated improved rectum and bladder sparing compared to initial AI OARs.
Conclusions:
- A fully automated AI contouring and planning workflow for prostate SBRT is not yet feasible.
- Physician-delineated target volumes remain essential for accurate prostate SBRT planning.
- Combining physician-delineated target volumes with post-processed AI contours for OARs shows encouraging results for achieving dosimetric goals in prostate SBRT.

