Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
Asymmetry in contralateral muscle excitation in proximal vs. distal muscles in upper extremities
Alexander Nynes1, David McGhie1, Morten Andreas Aune1
1Department of Sport Science, Sport and Human Movement Science Research Group (SaHMS), Nord University, Levanger, Norway.
Introduction:
The purpose of the study was to investigate potential asymmetry in contralateral muscle excitation (CME) in proximal versus distal muscles. Given the dominant arm's greater accuracy in unilateral tasks, reinforced by habitual use and neural specialization, along with neurophysiological constraints in the central nervous system and functional differences between proximal and distal muscles, higher CME was hypothesized in both the dominant compared to non-dominant and proximal compared to versus distal muscles. Secondly, a proximal-distal gradient of asymmetry in CME was hypothesized, with more pronounced bilateral asymmetry for distal compared to proximal muscles.
Methods:
Isometric shoulder and index finger flexion on the dominant and non-dominant arm was performed at 25, 50, 75, and 100% of maximum isometric force. Muscle excitation was measured using sEMG placed on the non-active contralateral flexor carpi radialis (FCR; distal condition) and on the anterior deltoid (proximal condition) on both the dominant and non-dominant arm.
Results:
In the unilateral shoulder flexion (proximal condition), no CME asymmetry between the non-active anterior deltoid on the dominant and non-dominant arm was observed. In contrast, in unilateral index finger flexion (distal condition), a pronounced asymmetry in CME was observed, with the FCR on the dominant arm exhibiting greater CME compared to the FCR on the non-dominant arm.
Discussion:
These findings highlight neurophysiological distinctions of the dominant side, especially in distal muscles where refined neural circuits support greater CME. In contrast, the absence of asymmetry in proximal muscles is consistent with their stronger bilateral communication, facilitated by denser interhemispheric and spinal commissural pathways. Overall, the results indicate that CME asymmetries are shaped by both cortical specialization and structural differences in neural connectivity, offering new insight into how dominance and proximal-distal distinctions interact in motor control.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:24Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
01:22Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
01:20Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
01:18Axial and Appendicular Muscles
Axial Muscles
Axial muscles, situated along the body's midline, are intricately connected to the axial skeleton, which includes the skull, spine, ribs, and sternum. These muscles facilitate facial expressions and...
01:16Muscles that Move the Forearm
Forearm Flexors
The biceps brachii, brachialis, and brachioradialis are forearm flexors. The biceps brachii is made up of two heads. Its long head originates at the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula, whereas that of the short head is...
01:31Muscles that Move the Arm
The pectoralis major has two origins. Its clavicular head originates on the medial half of the clavicle. In contrast, the sternocostal head originates on the costal cartilages of ribs 1-6, the sternum, and the aponeurosis of the external oblique of the...