Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher
Published on: February 23, 2018
Comparison of Four Lens Power Formulas for Sutureless Scleral-Fixated Carlevale Lens
Agnieszka Dyrda1,2, Liliana Araujo-Diaz1, Amanda Rey1
1Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain.
For sutureless scleral fixation (SSF) of the Carlevale intraocular lens (IOL), the SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas offer predictable refractive outcomes. The Barrett II formula is not recommended due to systematic myopic error.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
- Intraocular Lens Technology
Background:
- Sutureless scleral fixation (SSF) is a technique for implanting intraocular lenses (IOLs).
- Accurate IOL power calculation is crucial for achieving desired refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
- Predicting refractive outcomes for newer IOL fixation methods, like SSF, requires evaluating existing calculation formulas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictability of four common intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas for sutureless scleral fixation (SSF) of the Carlevale IOL.
- To compare the accuracy of SRK/T, Barrett II, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas in predicting postoperative refractive error in this specific IOL fixation scenario.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-center, interventional case series.
- Inclusion of 69 eyes undergoing SSF of the Carlevale IOL.
- Comparison of refractive prediction errors (PE) using SRK/T, Barrett II, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas, analyzing mean PE, median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error (MAE), and percentage of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D.
Main Results:
- The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas showed prediction errors closer to zero.
- The Barrett II formula demonstrated a statistically significant systematic myopic error.
- No significant differences were found in MedAE, MAE, or the percentage of eyes within ±0.50/±1.00 D between the formulas.
Conclusions:
- The SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas are suitable for predicting refractive outcomes with the Carlevale IOL using SSF.
- The Barrett II formula is less accurate for this specific application and is not recommended.
- These findings aid surgeons in selecting appropriate IOL power calculation formulas for SSF procedures.
More Related Videos
07:56Sequential Application of Glass Coverslips to Assess the Compressive Stiffness of the Mouse Lens: Strain and Morphometric Analyses
Published on: May 3, 2016
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023