Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.7K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine Learning Meets Pharmacokinetics: A Comparative Analysis of Predictive Models for Plasma Concentration-Time Profiles.

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2026
Same author

A dihydrouracil CRBN ligand mitigates IMiD associated safety liabilities in heterobifunctional targeted protein degrader.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Nonstandard Factor VIIa Binding Mode Reveals S1 Pocket Plasticity in Trypsin-Like Proteases.

ChemMedChem·2026
Same author

Dose-Response Effect of Watermelon Consumption on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Adults with Elevated Blood Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Accelerating wavepacket propagation with machine learning.

Journal of computational chemistry·2024
Same author

Draft genomes of two <i>Enterobacter hormaechei</i> strains isolated from catheterized urine samples from females experiencing overactive bladder symptoms.

Microbiology resource announcements·2024
Same journal

QSAR in the Browser: An Interactive Cheminformatics Web Application.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

FoldDoF: Utilizing the Primary Degrees of Freedom of Protein Backbone for Geometric Modeling and Generation.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Derisking Affinity Optimization for Macrocycles and Cyclic Peptides: High-Precision Free Energy Simulations across Five Diverse Targets.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

An End-User Audit of Reproducibility, Data Leakage, and Overfitting of the Top-Ranked ADMET Prediction Models in TDC Leaderboards.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PFASGroups: An Open-Source Framework for Automated Identification, Structural Classification, and Prioritization of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

DeepKbhb: Context-Aware Prediction of Human Lysine β-Hydroxybutyrylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Upgrading Reliability in Molecular Property Prediction by Robust Quantification of Uncertainty from Machine Learning

Alex Kötter1, Kanishka Singh2, Hans Matter2

  • 1Digital R&D Large Molecule Research, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|October 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantifying machine learning (ML) model uncertainty is crucial for molecular property prediction. This study reveals limitations in current uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods, especially with complex structure-activity relationships, and introduces a robust new UQ approach.

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K
Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level
08:29

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Published on: April 19, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K
Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level
08:29

Proteome-wide Quantification of Labeling Homogeneity at the Single Molecule Level

Published on: April 19, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Machine learning
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Predictive uncertainty quantification (UQ) is vital for machine learning (ML) in molecular property prediction.
  • Existing UQ methods face challenges in identifying errors linked to chemical space complexities and data representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between error sources and UQ performance in molecular activity prediction.
  • To evaluate the impact of data splitting strategies on UQ method evaluation.
  • To develop an improved UQ method for molecular ML models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of popular UQ methods on molecular activity datasets.
  • Investigation of error sources: chemical space regions and training data representation.
  • Development and validation of a novel UQ method.

Main Results:

  • Several UQ methods fail to detect poorly predicted compounds in steep structure-activity relationship (SAR) regions.
  • The data splitting strategy significantly influences UQ performance.
  • The proposed UQ method shows robust improvements across various evaluation scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Current UQ methods have limitations in identifying specific error sources in molecular property prediction.
  • A new, robust UQ method enhances reliability for ML-guided molecular discovery.
  • The developed UQ method is effective in active learning settings.