Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: Understanding and Detecting Environmental Antimicrobial Resistance by Combining Culture-Based Techniques and Genomics
Published on: July 19, 2024
Public perceptions and support for introduced microbes to combat hospital-acquired infections and antimicrobial
Christopher L Cummings1, Kristen D Landreville1, Jennifer Kuzma1,2
1Genetic Engineering and Society Center, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Abstract:
Hospital-acquired infections and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remain major global health threats, prompting interest in microbiome-based interventions that introduce beneficial microbes or genetic interventions to control pathogens and reduce AMR genes in hospital environments. Microbiome engineering, which can use advanced biotechnology, genetics, and microbial ecology principles to restructure microbial communities, is a rapidly growing field with applications in infection control. As researchers explore deploying beneficial microbes and other genetic interventions in clinical settings like hospital sinks, public perception becomes critical to responsible implementation. This study addresses how U.S. adults perceive microbiome evaluation, and education. Drawing on a nationally representative survey (N = 1,000), we conducted hierarchical ordinary least squares regression modeling to assess predictors of support across three domains: implementation of introduced microbiomes (IM), rigorous testing, and education for healthcare stakeholders. Results demonstrate that support for IM in hospital sinks is shaped less by demographic traits and more by emotional responses, trust in institutional efficacy, belief in intervention benefits, and a desire to learn about microbiome science. These findings advance previous knowledge by distinguishing cognitive, affective, and contextual predictors across distinct types of support. Contrary to expectations, prior familiarity and information-seeking were negatively associated with IM support, suggesting that some engagement or exposure to risk-framing may drive skepticism. Meanwhile, emotional reactions and perceived efficacy consistently predicted support for IM, testing, and education (i.e., across all dependent variables), underscoring the need to address affective and trust-based components of public engagement. This research contributes to an emerging empirical foundation for responsible microbiome innovation by grounding the analysis in the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) framework. With the technology still in early development, these insights provide critical guidance for biotechnology developers, policymakers, and hospital leaders seeking to align microbiome engineering with societal values through transparent communication, rigorous oversight, and inclusive education.
Insights
Public perception of microbiome engineering for hospitals hinges on trust and perceived benefits, not demographics. Emotional responses and institutional trust are key drivers for supporting these novel infection control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Microbiome Engineering
- Public Health
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Hospital-acquired infections and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are significant global health challenges.
- Microbiome engineering offers novel strategies for infection control by modifying microbial communities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess U.S. adults' perceptions of microbiome interventions in hospitals.
- To identify predictors of public support for implementing introduced microbiomes (IM), testing, and education.
Main Methods:
- A nationally representative survey of 1,000 U.S. adults was conducted.
- Hierarchical ordinary least squares regression modeling was used to analyze support predictors.
Main Results:
- Support for IM in hospital sinks was driven by emotional responses, trust, perceived benefits, and desire for education, not demographics.
- Prior familiarity and information-seeking were negatively associated with IM support, indicating potential skepticism.
- Emotional reactions and perceived efficacy consistently predicted support for interventions and education.
Conclusions:
- Public acceptance of microbiome engineering in healthcare settings depends on affective factors and trust.
- Addressing emotional responses and building institutional trust are crucial for responsible innovation and implementation.
- Findings guide developers, policymakers, and leaders in aligning microbiome engineering with societal values.
More Related Videos
08:58Isolation and Identification of Waterborne Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Molecular Characterization of their Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Published on: March 3, 2023
11:17Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Surface Membrane Barriers
The outer layer of the skin, the epidermis, is a robust barrier comprising layers of closely packed keratinized cells. This dense arrangement prevents microbes from penetrating the body. The periodic shedding of epidermal cells...
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...