Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
7.1K
Physical Activity Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
D David Thomas1,2, Linglin Xu2,3, Brian Yu2
1Informatics Programs, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
JMIR Infodemiology
|October 8, 2025
Summary
Social media health misinformation is a growing problem, particularly concerning physical activity. This review synthesizes research on physical activity misinformation on social media, highlighting common topics and platforms.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Digital Health
- Health Communication
Background:
- Social media is a primary source of health information, but its credibility varies widely.
- Misinformation regarding vaccines, nutrition, and cancer is well-documented, yet physical activity misinformation remains understudied.
- This gap is significant given the high volume of online discussions about physical activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize existing literature on physical activity misinformation disseminated via social media.
- To adhere to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Conducted comprehensive keyword searches across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (January 2016 - May 2025).
- Screened 9039 articles, with 168 selected for full-text review, and ultimately 33 meeting inclusion criteria for synthesis.
- Utilized PRISMA 2020 guidelines for systematic review methodology.
Main Results:
- The 33 studies covered diverse topics, including physical rehabilitation (45%), general physical activity (18%), and exercising with specific conditions (12%).
- YouTube (39%) and TikTok (21%) were the most studied platforms, with other content analyzed from sources shared widely online.
- Most studies (88%) analyzed existing content, with 82% reporting misinformation prevalence and 64% reporting reach metrics.
Conclusions:
- Research on social media physical activity misinformation is diverse, with YouTube being a key platform.
- Low-quality information is prevalent, and longitudinal studies are lacking.
- Multifaceted strategies, including improved messaging and institutional dissemination of high-quality information, are needed to combat misinformation.
Keywords:
AIartificial intelligencedigital healthexercisehealth misinformationkinesiologyonline contentonline misinformationphysical activitysocial mediasystematic reviewMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Exercise significantly impacts cardiovascular response, which is crucial for understanding patient health and designing effective treatment plans.
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

