Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Perceptions, Definitions, and Preparedness Regarding Low-Performing and Impaired Colleagues in Cardiothoracic and
Evangelia Samara1, Mona Momeni2, Agathi Karakosta1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Postoperative Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Objective:
To define low-performing colleagues in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia (LPC-CTVA), evaluate institutional preparedness to identify and manage such individuals, and identify predictors of recognition, reporting, and response behaviors.
Design:
International cross-sectional survey.
Setting:
Web-based data collection from June to September 2024.
Participants:
Of 878 responses, 537 (61.2%) were complete and analyzed, representing 57 countries.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
A 43-item questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed via professional societies, social media, and email. It assessed definitions of LPC-CTVA, institutional protocols, and preparedness to address underperformance. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. Thirteen of the 18 statements met consensus. Common indicators included non-compliance with infection control (80.0%), outdated knowledge (80.3%), repeated procedural failures (80.0%), and persistent negligence (79.1%). Institutional support was limited: among 464 respondents, 22.2% reported active supervision for underperformance, 15.3% reported the presence of identification mechanisms, and 11.7% indicated the existence of formal management processes. Although 39.9% of 434 had encountered a low-performing colleague, only 23.1% of 447 had reported one. Preparedness to manage impaired colleagues was reported by 46.2% of 418 respondents, and preparedness to manage underperforming colleagues by 44.1% of 416 respondents. Key barriers included the belief that others would act (33.7% of 265), perceived ineffectiveness (28.3%), and fear of retaliation (21.9%). Preparedness was more prevalent among older, more experienced clinicians, those in leadership roles, and those with prior experience in reporting.
Conclusions:
A consensus-based definition of LPC-CTVA has been established. However, institutional readiness and clinician confidence remain limited. Experience and structured systems enhance response capability.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
01:08Obedience
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
01:26Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
01:24General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...