Virtual reality vs. Manikin based training on emergency life saving basic rescue skills: a summative evaluation

Area of Science:

• Medical Education
• Simulation Technology
• Emergency Medicine Training

Background:

• Professional development is crucial for healthcare practitioners' proficiency.
• Innovative and efficient training methods are needed, especially post-COVID-19.
• Traditional manikin-based simulation has limitations in engagement and time efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

• To compare the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) versus traditional manikin-based simulation for teaching basic rescue skills.
• To evaluate the "Mongeth" VR program against conventional training methods.
• To assess the impact of VR on learner engagement and self-efficacy.

Main Methods:

• Quantitative summative program evaluation involving 98 first responders in Saudi Arabia.
• Participants were divided into VR (n=58) and Manikin (n=40) groups.
• Performance was assessed using standardized checklists for CPR, AED usage, stop the bleed, and choking management.

Main Results:

• The VR group showed significantly higher performance scores in AED usage, adult and infant choking management, and CPR.
• No significant difference was found between groups for "Stop the Bleed" skills.
• VR training enhanced learner engagement and self-efficacy, reducing time investment.

Conclusions:

• VR technology is a more time-efficient and engaging alternative to manikin-based training for basic rescue skills.
• VR significantly improves proficiency in CPR and choking management.
• This study supports integrating VR into healthcare education for improved population health outcomes.