Survival analysis of metachronous bilateral ectopic breast cancer utilizing the SEER database and the pioneering construction of a nomogram model
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Lizhi Teng1,2,3,4, Juntong Du1, Yuhan Dong1,2,3,4
1Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Introduction:
Metachronous bilateral ectopic breast cancer (MBEBC) is clinically rare, but the incidence has been increasing in recent years and no clear therapeutic guidance or prognostic assessment is available.
Methods:
Data on MBEBC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were gathered and randomly split into a training set and a validation set at a 7:3 ratio. Independent prognostic risk factors were identified through both univariate and multivariate analyses, and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors to predict survival outcomes.
Results:
From the SEER database, we collected data on a total of 8240 patients spanning the years 2005-2015. These patients were then randomly divided into a training set (5768) and a validation set (2472) for analysis. The clinicopathological features indicated that Grade 2 tumors were the most prevalent, with invasive ductal carcinoma comprising 71.2% of the cases. Additionally, the majority of MBEBC patients were classified as N0, and only a small fraction (4.2%) exhibited distant metastases. A multivariate COX regression model was developed to identify independent prognostic risk factors for patients whose first and second tumors were both invasive ductal carcinomas, as well as those with more extensive pathological types. Nomograms were also constructed for survival prediction of overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-special survival (BCSS) at 3, 5, and 10 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated. The AUC was greater than 0.7 in all models, with a 10-year OS of 78.0 (76.0-80.0) and a BCSS of 77.6 (76.0-79.3) in all patients. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrate that the nomogram possesses strong clinical predictive capability and high predictive accuracy.
Conclusion:
This study detailed the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with the clinically rare MBEBC and identified independent prognostic risk factors across various pathology types. Additionally, a nomogram was developed for individualized prediction of patients' BCSS and OS, offering a new adjunctive tool for the clinical management of MBEBC patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

