Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
A retrospective registry study comparing a portable school-based model and a standard clinic-based model
Anna Maria Heikkinen1,2, Teresa Niku1, Essi Teronen2
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Finland.
A school-based portable oral health model in Finland resulted in shorter recall intervals and fewer dental issues compared to the standard clinic-based model. Organizational factors significantly impact effective children's oral healthcare delivery.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Pediatric Dentistry
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Oral health examinations for primary school-age children in Finland are crucial for early detection and prevention of dental diseases.
- Two models of oral health examination exist: a school-based portable model and a clinic-based standard model.
- Socioeconomic factors can influence access to and outcomes of oral healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of a school-based portable oral health examination model versus a clinic-based standard model for primary school-age children in Finland.
- To identify differences in oral health outcomes, visit patterns, and recall intervals between the two models.
- To assess the role of organizational factors in oral healthcare delivery.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective registry study was conducted using electronic health records from 2020-2023.
- Data were collected from two socioeconomically comparable regions in Finland: Nokia (portable model, n=481) and Tampere (standard model, n=538).
- Analyzed variables included visit frequency, longest gap between visits, diagnoses, treatments, and recall intervals.
Main Results:
- The standard model showed significantly longer gaps between visits (median 25 vs. 11 months) and longer recall intervals (17 vs. 6 months).
- The standard model had a higher prevalence of caries (21.1% vs. 11.7%), restorative treatments (41.3% vs. 33.1%), and tooth extractions (35.5% vs. 22.4%).
- The portable model resulted in more children receiving dentist-only examinations (35% vs. 9.6%).
Conclusions:
- The school-based portable oral health model is more effective in ensuring timely dental care and better oral health outcomes for children.
- Organizational factors, rather than just geographical accessibility, play a critical role in the efficacy of oral healthcare systems.
- Implementing school-based portable models can lead to improved pediatric oral health surveillance and intervention in Finland.
More Related Videos
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...