Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Imageless robotic surgery and a personalized approach: optimizing TKA after ACL reconstruction
Luca Andriollo1, Aurelio Picchi2, Gerardo Demattia3
1Unità di Chirurgia Robotica, U.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy; Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; Artificial Intelligence Center, Alma Mater Europaea University, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Background:
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with an increased rate of complications. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the role of imageless robotic surgery and a personalized approach in TKA after prior ACLR.
Methods:
This prospective study involved 70 patients who underwent primary TKA: 35 with prior ACLR and 35 with primary OA. All surgeries were performed using an imageless robotic system. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed, including knee function (ROM, KSS, WOMAC), complications, and radiographic outcomes.
Results:
Despite significantly lower preoperative values in the ACLR group for maximum flexion (p = 0.021), KSS-knee (p = 0.041), KSS-function (p = 0.032), WOMAC-stiffness (p = 0.017), and WOMAC-function (p = 0.035), postoperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups, except for a residual reduction in knee flexion in the ACLR group (114.41° vs 128.61°, p < 0.001). Intraoperative adjustments were more frequent in the ACLR group, with a significantly higher rate of tibial recuts (20 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.017). No major complications or revisions were reported at the three-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
The use of imageless robotic surgery combined with a personalized approach can achieve comparable postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing TKA after ACLR and those with primary OA, while also reducing common issues associated with TKA in patients with a history of ACLR. The overall results indicate that robotic-assisted TKA is a safe and effective option for these patients.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II.
