Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
Published on: May 28, 2013
Newborn Phototherapy Irradiance Levels With and Without Commercial Covers
Dennis T Costakos1, Chris S Castor2
1Neonatology, Mayo Clinic Health System in Southwest Wisconsin, La Crosse, Wisconsin.
Insights
Phototherapy covers for newborns can reduce light intensity, but optimal irradiance levels are still achievable. Clinicians should consider cover effects to ensure effective treatment for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal care
- Phototherapy
- Medical physics
Background:
- Phototherapy is a standard treatment for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
- The use of covers with phototherapy devices is variable and may impact light delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of commercial covers on phototherapy irradiance levels.
- To compare irradiance from overhead and blanket phototherapy systems with and without covers.
Main Methods:
- Nonclinical study measuring irradiance (400-520 nm) from overhead and blanket systems.
- Evaluated irradiance with two types of covers (mesh swaddle, blanket pad) at different distances.
Main Results:
- Overhead system irradiance decreased by 14-15% with a mesh swaddle cover.
- Irradiance under the mesh swaddle zipper was substantially lower.
- Blanket system irradiance ranged from 61.1 to 98.5 μW/cm²/nm with various posterior coverings.
Conclusions:
- Commercial phototherapy covers significantly affect irradiance levels.
- Optimal irradiance can be achieved, potentially exceeding American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations.
- Awareness of cover effects is crucial for effective neonatal hyperbilirubinemia treatment.
Objective:
In phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, the use of covers placed between the newborn and the phototherapy source is variable. Guidelines often recommend a cover for the phototherapy blanket pad. Because covers could affect illumination levels, we assessed phototherapy irradiance levels from an overhead phototherapy system and a phototherapy blanket, with and without commercial covers.
Methods:
In this nonclinical study, the overhead phototherapy system used calibrated radiometer measurements from 420 to 500 nm at 2 distances below the light source; the phototherapy blanket used measurements from 400 to 520 nm. We measured irradiance in 4 different variations using 2 types of covers (a mesh swaddle and a phototherapy blanket pad).
Results:
For the overhead system, at 30.5 cm below the light source and with a mesh swaddle covering the meter, the irradiance was 29.5 μW/cm2/nm, which was 14% lower than the value without covering (34.4 μW/cm2/nm). The mean irradiance at 15 cm from the light source with the mesh covering the meter (38.5 μW/cm2/nm) was 15% lower than without a cover (45.4 μW/cm2/nm). The irradiance under the zipper of the mesh swaddle was substantially lower at either distance. For the phototherapy blanket, the irradiance measured in all the posterior covering variations ranged from 61.1 (nest plus swaddle) to 98.5 μW/cm2/nm (no covering).
Conclusions:
Clinicians should be aware that commercial phototherapy coverings affect irradiance; however, optimal irradiance can be achieved and may even exceed current American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations of 25 to 35 μW/cm2/nm.
More Related Videos
08:16Method for the Assessment of Effects of a Range of Wavelengths and Intensities of Red/near-infrared Light Therapy on Oxidative Stress In Vitro
Published on: March 21, 2015
07:27How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
Published on: August 19, 2020